UNC finds certainty in the uncertainty surrounding P.J. Hairston, Leslie McDonald

acarter@newsobserver.comNovember 14, 2013 

  • More information

    No. 12 UNC vs. Holy Cross

    When: 8 p.m.

    Where: Smith Center, Chapel Hill

    TV/Radio: ESPNU/101.5-WRAL

    Projected starting lineups

    Holy Cross (1-1)

    G Justin Burrell 8.5 ppg, 6 apg

    G Cullen Hamilton 22 ppg, 2 rpg

    F Macolm Miller 8 ppg, 5 rpg

    F Taylor Abt 2 ppg, 1.5 rpg

    C Dave Dudzinski 25.5 ppg, 10.5 rpg

    North Carolina (1-0)

    G Nate Britt 4 ppg, 3 apg

    G Marcus Paige 14 ppg, 5 apg

    F J.P. Tokoto 13 ppg, 5 apg

    F James Michael McAdoo 21 ppg, 9 rpg

    F Joel James 4 ppg, 8 rpg

    Player to watch

    Dave Dudzinski, center, Holy Cross

    Dudzinski is off to a fast start this season, and scored 25 and 26 points in Holy Cross’ first two games. He’ll test the Tar Heels’ defense on the interior. Though Dudzinski plays center for the Crusaders, he’s a bit undersized at 6-foot-9 and 227 pounds. Both Joel James and Kennedy Meeks, the two UNC players most likely to defend Dudzinski, will have a size advantage. Dudzinski averaged 15.2 points and 6.6 rebounds per game last season.

    Observations: UNC was nearly flawless in the first half last week against Oakland, and shot 74.2 percent from the field – the best ever in a half under coach Roy Williams. Assuming the shots don’t fall at such a pace on Friday night, this might offer a better indication of UNC’s potential without P.J. Hairston and Leslie McDonald. … Williams said on Thursday he’s hoping to somebody “step forward and say they’re better than everybody else” at center, where UNC will continue to use a rotation of Joel James, Kennedy Meeks and Desmond Hubert. … Holy Cross was picked to finish seventh out of 10 teams in the Patriot League’s preseason coaches poll.

    -Andrew Carter

— At last, North Carolina is beginning to find certainty amid the uncertainty. The Tar Heels understand their reality now: That there is no resolution for P.J. Hairston and Leslie McDonald, two players at the center of NCAA investigations, and there might not be for a while.

“It’s what it is,” Roy Williams, the UNC coach, said Thursday before repeating the phrase again moments later. “And you know, everybody is trying to do their best. And we’re trying to move along. … But it’s what it is. So we just go with it, do the best we can.”

UNC on Friday hosts Holy Cross, and it will be the Tar Heels’ second consecutive game without Hairston and McDonald, the team’s most experienced guards. Both are sitting out while the NCAA completes investigations into impermissible benefits that Hairston and McDonald are believed to have received.

The university has remained quiet about the case, and hasn’t detailed why it has taken so long to resolve. That stance continued Thursday.

“The university and the NCAA are still working together to resolve an eligibility issue,” Steve Kirschner, a UNC athletic department spokesman, said before Williams’ regularly-scheduled meeting with reporters. “There’s no timetable. It’ll be done when it’s done.”

Whether that’s in a day, a week or a month – or longer – remains unclear. What is clear is the uncertainty surrounding Hairston and McDonald has become a part of the Tar Heels’ normal routine in this abnormal early season.

Hairston and McDonald have still been practicing as they normally would, Williams said, but instead of spending most of their time with the starters, they now spend more time with the “blue team” – which consists mostly of the reserves and others who don’t play as often during games.

“We have seen more lineups (recently) with them on the blue team just to get us ready for (games), for example,” sophomore guard Marcus Paige said. “But coach is still mixing them in with the white group and keeping them as a part of the team.”

Paige is among those whose roles has been most affected by the absence of Hairston, a junior who led UNC in scoring last season, and McDonald, the team’s only scholarship senior. With them, Paige would have started the season at point guard. Without them, he has moved to shooting guard, and Nate Britt, a freshman, has started at point guard.

The two point-guard lineup worked well in the 84-61 season-opening victory against Oakland last week. Britt pushed the pace, while Paige tied his career high with four 3-pointers.

“It’s not the first thing that I thought of when I looked at our lineup, obviously,” Paige said of starting alongside Britt. “But I knew we were going to share the court a little bit together just because coach had told us that there was a possibility. He likes having multiple ball-handlers on the court, and that helps speed our offense up.”

The cases involving Hairston and McDonald, meanwhile, might continue to operate at a slow pace. Paige said he’s “extremely frustrated” that the case hasn’t been decided and, he said, “A lot of us are (frustrated).”

“It’d just be nice to know, so you know you can move on,” Paige said.

The more time has passed, the more rumors have spread about Hairston and McDonald’s status. Speculation, too, has become a part of UNC’s reality early on, as has the fact that the Hairston and McDonald storyline has overshadowed all others at the start of the season.

The saga has created its own byproducts, too: like the two point-guard starting lineup, and the opportunity for the emergence of sophomore forward J.P. Tokoto, who scored a career-high 13 points – all in the first half – last week against Oakland. Williams at one point on Thursday said Tokoto has been the team’s second-best player in practice throughout the preseason and early part of the season.

The best?

“I thought I’ve already said that once,” Williams said. “… By far the most impressive player in practice would be P.J. Hairston. It’s not even close.”

Carter: 919-829-8944; Twitter: @_andrewcarter

News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service