Denis DuBay: Landry out of touch

November 26, 2013 

Marc Landry’s lament (“The false goal of equal results,” Nov. 13 column) that we neglect our brightest students trying to narrow the gap between them and the rest is laden with mistakes. He begins by stating the obvious, there is a bell curve of performance among us.

He errs when he equates expending extra effort to help “challenged groups” with trying to pull up one end of the bell curve. “Challenged groups” are just that, groups who need extra help not because they belong at one end of the curve, but because their innate ability has been challenged by unequal opportunities to develop. We give them extra help so their innate abilities can be realized, and they can assume their rightful place on the bell curve, not languish at one end because they missed out on early opportunities to thrive.

Landry showcases his intolerance by claiming our future well-being “lies mostly in the dreams and aspirations of the top 5 or 10 percent of our students.” First, well-being itself might best be defined by how many of us reach our aspirations. A 90 to 95 percent failure rate would hurt. Second, a democracy needs its entire population well-educated, not just the top 5 to 10 percent.

Denis DuBay


News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service