Hidden info in photos may help identify criminals

Los Angeles TimesJanuary 5, 2014 

Rob Jenkins is a psychologist at the University of York in England

UNIVERSITY OF YORK

Can the eyes of photographed crime victims help authorities spot their victimizers?

According to new research published in the journal PLOS One, high-resolution photographs can be “mined” for hidden information. Specifically, the authors said that photographs of faces can reveal enough visual information on bystanders to identify them.

In a sampling of 32 study participants, test subjects were able to spot familiar faces reflected in the pupils of someone who was photographed 84 percent of the time, researchers said. When the reflected images were of unfamiliar people, observers were able to match the person to a second mug shot with 71 percent accuracy.

“Criminal investigations often use photographic evidence to identify subjects,” wrote study authors Rob Jenkins, a psychologist at the University of York in England, and Christie Kerr of the University of Glasgow in Scotland.

“By zooming in on high-resolution face photographs, we were able to recover images of unseen bystanders from reflections in the subject’s eyes. … For crimes in which the victims are photographed (hostage taking, child sex abuse, etc.), reflections in the eyes of the photographic subject could help to identify perpetrators,” the authors wrote.

The study notes that the word “pupil” comes from the Latin word “pupilla,” which can mean young girl or doll; the word conveys the idea that when one looks into someone else’s eyes, they see a tiny doll-like version of themselves reflected back.

In the study, Jenkins and Kerr photographed eight individuals, who were themselves looking at four people who were behind the camera. Study subjects were asked to either match the images to a series of mug shots or to identify people who were familiar to them in the eye reflections.

The study authors said that humans were extremely adept at identifying human faces, even if the images were very poor. In the portrait photographs, the person’s face occupied about 12 million pixels, while the images of bystanders in the person’s eye accounted for just 54,000 pixels, less than 0.5 percent of the portrait subject’s facial area.

Jenkins, who studies facial recognition, described the portrait photographs used as passport-type photos. The authors noted that there were limits to the forensic use of such photographs. Namely, they must be shot in high resolution and the subject must be looking directly at the camera.

“For now, our findings suggest a novel application for high-resolution photography: for crimes in which victims are photographed, corneal image analysis could be useful for identifying perpetrators.”

News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service