Emma Akpan: On vulnerable’s side

February 1, 2014 

In response to J. Peder Zane’s Jan. 29 column “Politics and morality – a dangerous mix”: Conservatives use morality to justify a constitutional amendment to discriminate against lesbian North Carolinians and to cut safe reproductive health resources for women.

Morality drives issues that should be private to the public when the legislature should be focusing on expanding unemployment and health care benefits that would help all of North Carolina’s residents.

Rev. William Barber’s use of morality is not dangerous to democracy; it is appropriate because it takes the side of the most vulnerable residents of North Carolina.

The morality argument is not a thing of the past, it is alive and well today.

Emma Akpan


News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service