DENR proposes expanding scope of coal ash settlement with Duke

ablythe@newsobserver.comFebruary 25, 2014 

  • McCrory: Move coal ash ponds away from rivers

    Gov. Pat McCrory on Saturday said coal ash ponds should be moved farther from rivers in North Carolina, and the ash should be placed in lined facilities.

    “The immediate goal is to stop any existing leaks, clean up any ramifications from existing leaks and spills, and third, have a long-term solution and hopefully in most cases move these ponds or put a permanent cap on,” McCrory said, speaking during a break at a meeting of the National Governors Association.

    It was his strongest stance yet on what should happen in light of the Feb. 2 spill of 39,000 tons of coal ash from a Duke Energy containment site on the Dan River.

    “I know at the Dan River site there’s a potential site already to at least move it away from the river, which could probably most logically be done in a short period of time, and we’re looking at ways we can encourage the utility to do just that,” McCrory said.

    He said wasn’t just talking about the spill site.

    “I hope in most cases we can move the pond,” so that it isn’t near water, McCrory said. “I’m not an engineer or a scientist but that would be hopefully the best option.”

    The governor, a former Duke Energy employee, said long-term protection of the state’s rivers also was needed for coal ash ponds at plants that are no longer running.

    Asked whether ponds should have liners to prevent toxic waste from leaching out, McCrory said: “Yeah, I think there should be requirements to have liners in and around, but that’s something for the engineers to determine, not politicians.” Renee Schoof, Washington Bureau

  • N.C. coal ash by the numbers

    14 Number of coal ash sites Duke Energy has in N.C.

    32 Number of lagoons Duke operates in N.C.

    106 million Tons of coal ash Duke stores in N.C.

    84 million Tons of coal ash soaking in lagoons

    39,000 Tons of coal ash Duke says spilled into Dan River

— Attorneys for the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources have alerted a Wake County Superior Court judge to the agency’s plans to seek approval of a proposal with Duke Energy to settle two coal ash lawsuits.

In a letter to Judge Paul Ridgeway dated Feb. 20, the attorneys for the state outlined their intentions to bring forward a settlement proposal they had withdrawn from court consideration some 10 days earlier. Environmentalists had roundly criticized the proposed $99,000 settlement, and the court hearing to review it came amid great scrutiny of the relationship between DENR and the nation’s largest utility after a coal ash spill on the Dan River.

A federal criminal probe is underway, and the U.S. Justice Department has issued subpoenas to the environmental oversight agency and Duke Energy in anticipation of the convening of a federal grand jury on March 18, 19 and 20.

The new proposal, which DENR plans to offer the day after the grand jury session ends, might go beyond the initial settlement focus – violations at coal ash lagoons in Asheville and on Mountain Island Lake near Charlotte, according to DENR’s counsel.

A hearing in Superior Court is set for April 4.

“Recommendations might include, but are not limited to, maintaining the consent order as proposed, recommending the inclusion of additional provisions, or expanding the overall scope of the consent order to include additional facilities,” states the letter signed by Kathryn Jones Cooper, special deputy attorney general for North Carolina.

Environmental advocates greeted the news with skepticism.

D.J. Gerken, managing attorney at Southern Environmental Law Center, said in a phone interview Tuesday that environmentalists worry a new settlement could include 12 more coal-ash plants that are not part of the two lawsuits. They also are concerned that a settlement would call for more study and further delay for what they contend is an obvious solution.

The law firm represents the conservation groups calling for a cleanup of Duke Energy’s Asheville coal ash pollution. The groups have long lobbied for a cleanup of all coal ash sites in North Carolina and removal of the hazardous material to dry storage areas.

“We certainly have no objection to rethinking, redrawing this settlement,” Gerken said.

“Enforcing the law against all 14 plants would be wonderful. The concern here is that everything falls short of the fundamental job DENR is supposed to be doing. If they take that same approach and expand it, that would not be good.”

Blythe: 919-836-4948; Twitter: @AnneBlythe1

News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service