Dave Greune: Must be satire

March 17, 2014 

Was J. Peder Zane’s March 12 column “Loose with labels, fast with facts” an attempt at satire? He laments how political discourse has deteriorated to shouting matches using opinion, provocative language, attacks and outright lies and then proceeds to write a column doing exactly that. Are these the words of polite discussion? “Ignorant booboisee,” “narratives untethered to reality,” “fact-free canards” and “libelous opinions” – how about these statements presented as fact?

“Democrats first slashed teacher pay.” Average teacher pay in 2003-2004 was 23rd in the country, and it is now 46th. When exactly did Democrats slash teacher pay? Does he mean they did not give raises some years?

“Democrats let Duke Energy create dangerous coal ash ponds and thankfully Republicans are considering new safeguards.” Republicans have cut 225 jobs from DENR since 2011, obliterated the Clean Water Management Trust Fund from $100 million to $11.5 million and basically given private industry carte blanche.

“The Koch brothers have spent millions of dollars attacking Democrats – a tiny fraction of the billions spent by labor unions.” In the 2012 presidential election, each candidate spent about $1 billion. Outside spending attacking Obama was $258 million vs. $68 million attacking Romney.

I agree we need better discourse. Zane’s article does nothing to further that ideal.

Dave Greune


News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service