Dickie Benzie: Shared expenses

March 22, 2014 

Duke Energy is not only a private, for-profit company, it is also a monopoly. What other choice do we, as consumers, have to turn on our lights, our heaters, our air conditioners? Lest we back-pedal to firewood, candles and ice boxes, we are pretty much dependent on Duke Energy.

I am a dyed-in-the-wool, free-market capitalist (I also own utility stocks), but in this case, the shareholders have enjoyed a steady gain in their “per share” value (closed at $33.84 on March 15, 1995; closed at $70.24 on March 18) plus a healthy dividend. Had Duke been handling the ash properly, these profits would not have been as great.

“Fixing” this problem should not fall solely on the backs of defenseless consumers. We did realize a cheaper power expense because of the environmental neglect so this should be a shared expenditure. Reach into the the deep Duke coffers and bump the price up a bit.

Dickie Benzie, Charlotte

News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service