Genetically modified foods baffle consumers

Associated PressMay 20, 2014 

— Genetically modified foods have been around for years, but most Americans have no idea whether they are eating them.

The Food and Drug Administration says the foods don’t need to be labeled, so the state of Vermont enacted legislation to require labeling of genetically modified organisms, or GMOs.

There’s a lot of confusion about genetically modified foods and their safety.

Some people feel very strongly about GMOs. Opponents say consumers have the right to know whether their food contains GMOs. The Vermont law is their first major victory.

The food industry and companies that genetically engineer seeds have pushed back against the labeling laws, saying GMOs are safe and labels would be misleading.

“It’s really polarizing,” says New York University’s Marion Nestle, a professor of nutrition and food studies. “There’s no middle ground.”

A look at the debate and some of the facts about genetically modified foods:

What they are

Genetically modified foods are plants or animals that have had genes copied from other plants or animals inserted into their DNA. It’s not a new idea – humans have been tinkering with genes for centuries through selective breeding. Think dogs bred to be more docile pets, cattle bred to be beefier, or tomatoes bred to be sweeter.

What’s different about genetically modified foods is that the manipulation is done in a lab. Engineers don’t need to wait for nature to produce a desired gene; they speed up the process by transferring a gene from one plant or animal to another.

Most of the nation’s corn and soybeans are genetically engineered to resist pesticides and herbicides. A papaya in Hawaii is modified to resist a virus. The FDA is considering an application from a Massachusetts company to approve a genetically engineered salmon that would grow faster than traditional salmon.

In your grocery cart

Most genetically modified corn and soybeans are used in cattle feed, or are made into ingredients such as corn oil, cornstarch, high-fructose corn syrup or soybean oil. In some of those products, the manufacturing processmay remove some of the GMOs.

A few fruits and vegetables are engineered – the Hawaiian papaya and some squash and zucchini, for example. Only a small amount of sweet corn, the corn we eat, is genetically modified.

But there’s no genetically modified meat or fish, like the fast-growing salmon, in the market now; the Food and Drug Administration has yet to approve any.

The risks

The vast majority of scientific research has found genetically engineered foods to be generally safe.

An Italian scientist’s review of 10 years of research, published in 2013, concluded that research conducted so far has not detected “any significant hazard directly connected with the use of GM crops.”

One French research team raised safety questions, but their much-criticized 2012 study linking genetically modified corn to rat tumors was retracted in 2013 by the scientific publisher, who cited weak evidence supporting the conclusions.

The Center for Science in the Public Interest, a well-known critic of food companies and artificial and unhealthy ingredients in foods, has not opposed genetically modified foods, on the basis that there’s no evidence they are harmful.

Though what we are eating now appears safe, the main concerns for the future would be new foods – from the U.S. or abroad – that somehow become allergenic or toxic through the engineering process. The FDA says the foods it has evaluated so far have not been any more likely to cause an allergic or toxic reaction than foods from traditionally bred plants.

Unlike animals, the FDA is not required to approve genetically engineered crops for consumption. However, most companies go through a voluntary safety review before they put them on the market.

The benefits

There are clear benefits for the agricultural industry – the crops that are resistant to pesticides and herbicides, for example. And companies like Monsanto that produce modified seeds say their technologies will be needed to feed a rising world population as they engineer crops to adapt to certain climates and terrains.

While most modified foods have so far been grown to resist chemicals or disease, advocates envision engineering crops to make them more nutritious as well. Food animals have been engineered to be bred to be free of diseases, be cleaner in their environments or grow more efficiently, though none has yet been approved in the U.S.

The politics

In the absence of a federal labeling standard, GMO opponents have gone to the states to try to get a patchwork of labeling laws approved – a move that could eventually force a national standard.

Ballot measures in California and Washington state failed, but the legislative effort prevailed in Vermont. Maine and Connecticut also have passed laws requiring labels, but they don’t take effect unless other states follow suit. The food industry is expected to challenge the Vermont law in court.

There are 85 pending GMO labeling bills in 29 states, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

In Congress, the food industry is pushing a House bill that would head off mandatory labeling by proposing new voluntary labels nationwide – an attempted end run around the state-by-state laws.

News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service