News & Observer | newsobserver.com | With a new chief, TTA tries again to tackle traffic

Published: Jan 20, 2007 12:00 AM
Modified: Jan 20, 2007 05:12 AM

With a new chief, TTA tries again to tackle traffic

Agency making a quick review, update of rail, bus, road choices

Story Tools

WHERE DO WE MAKE TRACKS?

What Triangle destinations and transportation corridors will be ripe candidates for trains or other transit investment 20 or 30 years from now? Contribute your opinions online at the Crosstown Traffic blog (blogs.newsobserver.com/crosstown/).

What happens next

Guided by the Triangle J Council of Government, local planners are beginning a fresh analysis of traffic congestion and predicted job and residential growth along the TTA project corridor and other highways and rail lines in the Triangle. Their technical proposals are expected by early summer.

The issues they will weigh include which areas could make best use of major transit investments and what types of transit service are feasible.

The new proposals will be aired in community meetings and evaluated by a 24-member citizen panel to be appointed by elected officials who make up the Triangle's two metropolitan planning organizations, which set local transportation priorities. Bill Cavanaugh of Raleigh, retired CEO of Progress Energy, has been named as one of the panel's co-chairmen.

Leaders of the two transportation planning boards say they hope to adopt a new transit plan in October.

DAVID D. KING

General manager, Triangle Transit Authority.

Born: May 5, 1946, Daytona Beach, Fla. Grew up in Lumberton.

Education: Davidson College, 1968. MBA, UNC-Chapel Hill, 1970.

Career: Thirty-three years at the state Department of Transportation, including lead responsibilities for public transportation since 1975. Served as deputy transportation secretary from 1993 until his retirement in 2006.

Advertisements
David D. King's one-year contract gives him until October to get the Triangle Transit Authority back on track. But he takes a long view. The year he worries about is 2030.

By then, an estimated 1.9 million people will live in Durham, Orange and Wake counties. That's 780,000 new residents -- like adding another county the size of Wake today.

"Given the problems that we face in supplying highway capacity, how are those people going to get around?" King asked members of the state Board of Transportation last week. "Where are they going to live?"

King, 60, retired as the state's public transportation chief last summer, just as the TTA was giving up an 11-year bid for federal money to build a 28-mile regional rail line through Durham, Research Triangle Park, Cary and Raleigh. TTA board members persuaded King to put his golf clubs away, and in October he signed on as general manager for 12 months.

The rail project crashed after federal transit officials concluded that it would serve too few riders to justify its soaring costs, estimated in 2005 at $810 million. Now, Triangle mayors, county commissioners and business executives are working up a new approach to tackle traffic problems and transit needs.

Time for new ideas

It's the first rethinking for transit since 1995, when regional leaders settled on a rail route that paralleled Interstate 40 and the Durham Freeway. Now they want to decide quickly where to build the first transit improvements, and -- perhaps a tougher question -- how to pay for them.

By the end of 2007, they hope to produce a new plan for regional rail or bus rapid transit investments, backed with fresh technical studies and bolstered with broad community consensus.

"There's a lot of support to take a fresh look at the overall transit situation," Raleigh Mayor Charles C. Meeker said. "How much support it gets will depend on the ultimate plan that is adopted."

There's no short list yet.

The official map of possibilities shows conceivable commuter routes radiating from RTP to such outlying points as Mebane, Rougemont, Franklinton, Middlesex, Selma, Clayton and Fuquay-Varina. We could end up with buses on toll roads and in carpool lanes, or with trains on freeway medians.

The original TTA proposal is still in the running. Its trains would serve some of the Triangle's biggest university, government and research centers.

Still, the new transit plan could push TTA's ideas aside in favor of light rail or express bus service from booming suburbs such as Wake Forest and Brier Creek -- easing pressures along busy corridors where traffic conditions are far worse now than they looked to planners back in 1995.

"We need to take a look at all our transportation needs outside the rail corridor that TTA had looked in for the last 10 years," said Philip R. Isley, a Raleigh City Council member long scornful of the rail project. "We've got to look at people coming from the southern part of [Wake County], from Garner and Clayton, and how they can get to the Park rapidly."

Mending fences

Tall and sleepy-eyed with thick white hair and a quick, warm wit, King pursues his job with a patient sense of urgency.

He still sees merit in the original rail proposal, but this is a year to hear other ideas, he says. Asked about other possible candidates, he launches a brisk discussion of corridors that deserve consideration.

King says TTA officials lost touch with local leaders in recent years, as they focused on pushing the rail proposal through an arduous federal review. While he keeps the wheels rolling on TTA buses that carry 4,000 riders each day, King is also mending fences with business executives and the governments in Wake, Durham and Orange counties that established the TTA in 1989.


Next page >

Staff writer Bruce Siceloff can be reached at 829-4527 or bruce.siceloff@newsobserver.com.

Get $150+ in coupons in every Sunday N&O. Click here for convenient home delivery.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company