'); } -->
More than 50 strategies to cut greenhouse gases -- from making government buildings more efficient to reducing tailpipe emissions -- were recommended Tuesday by a panel established to help state lawmakers develop a global warming plan.
If all 56 recommendations of the N.C. Climate Action Plan Advisory Group were adopted, the state would return to 1990 levels of greenhouse gas emissions within 13 years -- despite three decades of rapid growth. That would cut projected emissions to nearly half what they would be if the state did nothing, according to the group's draft report.
The 43-member group met Tuesday to refine the report, which it expects to submit to lawmakers by the end of the year. A separate, overlapping group is advising lawmakers on which proposals to adopt as laws.
The proposals include remedies large and small, such as trapping methane-producing animal waste and upgrading coal plants with new technologies. Most are aimed at using less energy to cut the amount of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
"The important underlying theme in the recommendations is energy conservation and efficiency," said Tom Mather, a spokesman for the Division of Air Quality, which has overseen the group's efforts. "That's where you're going to yield the most reduction."
Mather said another group of reforms aims to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere by preserving forest land and trees.
The reforms would have an effect on businesses, government offices, farms and the marketplace -- in ways critics say won't be popular.
Proposals such as adopting a statewide cap for greenhouse gas emissions would raise energy costs for everyone, said Roy Cordato, vice president for research at the John Locke Foundation, while a focus on controlling growth would restrict land use.
He said his group will fight proposals as they move through the legislature, and he expects others to do the same.
"I would expect a groundswell of opposition once it becomes clear that they're asking citizens to pay higher taxes and have their freedoms restricted," Cordato said.
The climate group's preliminary cost estimates show that adopting the measures could create tens of thousands of jobs and expand the state's economy by opening entrepreneurial opportunities. The measures would also create savings in energy costs, though some of those gains would be offset by upfront investments in new technologies.
The advisory group was created in 2005 to come up with ways to curb the effects of global warming. It is composed of representatives from businesses, government agencies, universities and environmental groups, and its recommendations will be considered by the Legislative Commission on Global Climate Change. That commission will determine whether to advocate their adoption by the General Assembly.
Some of the proposals don't require legislative approval. Mather said the state Division of Air Quality will start measuring carbon-dioxide emissions from various industries, for instance, which it had never done before.
Other proposals already have been adopted, such as requiring the increased use of renewable energy sources.
The group culled 56 proposals from more than 300 in a process that was sometimes contentious, said Jim Southerland, an environmental engineer who oversaw a working group on energy use.
Now that the proposals are set, the larger battles are likely to come as the legislature picks and chooses among them. "I think we would be fooling ourselves if we said we expected all this to be done," Southerland said.
Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.
The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.
Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.
If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.