News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Mental Disorder: The Failure of Reform

Published: Feb 24, 2008 12:30 AM
Modified: Feb 26, 2008 08:20 AM

Reform wastes millions, fails mentally ill

Mental-health changes aimed to improve community treatment, but providers took clients shopping, swimming and to movies for $61 an hour

Story Tools

The series

Part 1: Reform wastes millions, fails mentally ill

Part 2: Companies cash in on new service

Part 3: Serious mental therapy fades

Part 4: Hospitals, nearly forgotten, teem with abuse

Part 5 Patients die from poor care

Q: What do we do now?

NEED TO CHANGE

The 2001 mental-health reforms came after several state studies and a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court decision caused state leaders to conclude that they were relying too heavily on psychiatric hospitals. That reliance ran counter to the high court's decision that requires states to treat people with disabilities in the least restrictive setting.

"People talk about how the system's really a mess now, but it had some big problems before," said Rep. Verla Insko, a Chapel Hill Democrat. "The hospitals were failing. ... And a lot of people weren't getting services that they needed. Every study we had said you need to make these changes."

THE REPORTER AND THE RESEARCH

Pat Stith, 65, has been an investigative reporter for 35 years, focusing primarily on state government. He has won numerous state and national awards, including the Pulitzer Prize. Stith has worked for The N&O since 1971, and he's a member of the N.C. Journalism Hall of Fame.

For this series, Stith acquired numerous electronic and paper records and interviewed more than 30 employees of the N.C. Department of Health and Human Services. He also talked with key leaders in the legislature and the governor's office, psychiatrists, mental-health activists, auditors and others.

Advertisements


< Previous page
Next page >

She said the lack of proper treatment is causing more people who are mentally ill or who have a substance-abuse problem to be taken to hospital emergency rooms -- or jail. And they're rotating in and out of the state's psychiatric hospitals. On some days, state hospitals are so full that they are refusing to accept new patients.

Since 2001, at least 13 people committed suicide or overdosed on drugs less than a week after being discharged from state hospitals. Some died within hours.

In a case that grabbed headlines in May 2007, Stephen Ryan Gibson led state troopers on a 70-mile chase in a stolen car. The chase ended with his shooting death on Interstate 40 in Raleigh. Gibson, 23, had been sent to Dorothea Dix Hospital on an involuntary commitment order a month earlier.

Hospital officials decided outpatient care was enough and released him in less than two hours. Records show the adult admissions ward at Dix was at or over its capacity for much of that week.

Counties forced out

More than six years ago, the General Assembly voted overwhelmingly to tear down, then rebuild, the way the state treats mentally ill people, about 210,000 of whom seek state help each year.

The state set out to reduce the use of its four hospitals and shift treatment to communities. A study requested by legislators said part of the additional cost could be paid for with money saved by shrinking hospitals and staff.

Federal, state and local governments provide mental-health services to the poor. A little more than a third of the cost is borne by the state and local governments in North Carolina, the rest by federal taxpayers.

Before reform, mental-health services were provided at the local level by county and regional groups and the private providers who, in effect, worked for them.

After reform, counties were forced to get out of the treatment business. They formed local groups that were supposed to manage the providers.

But the state got the plan backward, forcing the counties to divest first.

"We were told to do it right away," said Yvonne Copeland, executive director of the N.C. Council of Community Programs, which represents the county entities.

Services at the local level started drying up with little or nothing to take their place, and the state eliminated more than 500 hospital beds. No one expected that it would take years to get approval for a new, supposedly improved package of community services from the federal government.

Federal approval of the new services didn't come until late December 2005. The state launched its new community services three months later, on March 20, 2006.

The Department of Health and Human Services had planned for years for that Monday in March, writing descriptions for the services it wanted, figuring out how much to pay and haggling with federal officials over the details.

Finally, on March 20, the state began offering an array of mostly new services to people suffering from mental illness or substance abuse. Seven of the services, including intensive in-home therapy for severely emotionally disturbed children, are most likely to keep people out of hospitals. Two other, more basic, services were known as community support.

And from that day to this, community support services have hemorrhaged money.

Stunning costs

In January 2005, the state told the federal government those two services, community support for children and community support for adults, would cost less than $5 million a month.

Now department officials say that estimate was flawed and should have been increased.


< Previous page
Next page >

pat.stith@newsobserver.com or (919) 829-4537
Staff writer Michael Biesecker and news researcher Brooke Cain contributed to this report.
No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.


The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

Member of the
Real Cities Network

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company