News & Observer | newsobserver.com | In Baghdad, Rice calls al-Sadr a coward

Published: Apr 21, 2008 12:30 AM
Modified: Apr 21, 2008 01:22 AM

In Baghdad, Rice calls al-Sadr a coward

 

Story Tools

SADRISTS DEFIANT

Followers of hardline cleric Muqtada al-Sadr raised the stakes Sunday in the showdown with Iraq's government, refusing to disband their militia. The U.S. military said 40 Shiite militants were killed in fierce fighting in southern Iraq.

Iraqi soldiers took control Sunday of the last stronghold of al-Sadr's Mahdi Army militia in Basrah.

Prime Minister Nouri Al-Maliki, a Shiite, has demanded that al-Sadr disband his Mahdi Army, the country's biggest Shiite militia, or his followers will not be allowed to run in provincial elections this fall. Al-Sadr's followers, who control 30 of the 275 parliament seats, rejected that demand Sunday and instead called for an end to U.S.-Iraqi military operations in Sadr City, the Baghdad stronghold of the Mahdi Army, and Shula, another Shiite district of the capital.

The Associated Press

AP NEWS VIDEO


Requires Internet Explorer
Advertisements
BAGHDAD - U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice arrived in Baghdad on Sunday for an unannounced visit one day after the Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr threatened an all-out war against the Iraqi government.

Rice called al-Sadr a coward hiding in Iran while praising Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki for his recent offensive in the southern port city of Basrah that sparked an uprising by al-Sadr's militia, the Mahdi Army.

Since the March 25 government offensive in Basrah, where the Mahdi Army dominates, the Sadrists and their militia have angrily accused the government of trying to undercut their movement prior to October provincial elections, when they will likely win many of the Shiite southern provinces from their Shiite rivals in the government.

If al-Sadr's militia, conservatively estimated at about 60,000 men, were to rise up, it could mean the end of the drop in violence in Iraq and an inter-sectarian war. Already, thousands of government soldiers have deserted in both Basrah and Sadr City, refusing to fight the Shiite militia. Some deserted because of threats to their families, others from a moral objection by the mostly Shiite Iraqi security forces to fighting their Shiite brothers.

Iraqi government officials have told McClatchy Newspapers that al-Maliki, who gained wide support from Sunni officials for taking on the Mahdi Army, went into the fight with no preparation and now is in a battle that he can't extract himself from. U.S. support for al-Maliki puts U.S. forces on one side of a bloody intra-Shiite showdown.

Rice used her visit to praise al-Maliki's choice to take on the militia. Fighting al-Sadr, who has declared that resistance against U.S. forces is legitimate, is an "internal Iraqi matter," she said.

"But, clearly, the prime minister has laid down some ground rules which any functioning democratic state would insist upon, having to do with, you know, arms belonging to the state, not to -- not in private hands," she said. "The current circumstances come out of what I think is a very important and indeed appropriate action that the Iraqi government has taken."

Al-Sadr has consistently called for peace since he froze his militia Aug. 29 and again in February; his freeze has been a major factor in curbing violence in Iraq. But Sadrists say their movement has come under attack continually since that time, and they feel humiliated because they have been asked to stand down.

The Iraqi government seemed to ignore al-Sadr's "final warning" Saturday of a "war until liberation" if the U.S.-backed Iraqi security forces didn't stop attacking his followers. Iraqi soldiers continued their confiscation of weapons and the evacuation of government buildings in Basrah.

All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published, broadcast or redistributed in any manner.
No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.


The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company