News & Observer | newsobserver.com |

Columns by Ted Vaden

You win: 'alphaobits' bite the dust

- Staff Writer

Published: Sun, May. 07, 2006 12:00AM

Modified Sun, May. 07, 2006 02:10AM

Bookmark and Share email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

Okay, obituary lovers. You win. In recent weeks, regular readers of death notices let us know in their own kind ways that they did not appreciate changes made last month in The N&O's paid obit listings. "Atrocious," "annoying," "disgusting," "horrible," confusing," "a mess," "a total mess" are some of the printable observations that leapt from my phone last week.

So, The N&O will go back (soon) to the old way of displaying paid death notices. The readers have spoken. The N&O listened. (This time, anyway. Readers might not have such luck in asking the paper to change its editorial philosophy.)

To recap: Last month, The N&O changed the obituary page layout to display paid notices alphabetically. That was intended as a reader service, to make individual notices easier to find. Problem was, alphabetizing necessarily resulted in some obituaries being "broken" from the bottom of one column to the top of the next.

Having encountered some unhappiness with the change, I asked readers in last week's Public Editor column to let us know, by phone or e-mail, whether they preferred an alphabetical or unbroken format.

The envelope please: I received 85 responses. Of those, 77 preferred the old, unbroken format; four liked alphabetical and four were undecided (how can you be undecided on a topic like that?) And that doesn't include the dozens of people who contacted us before my survey.

The N&O may be hard-headed, but it's not hard-hearted. Not only is the paper going back to the old format, it will add a separate alphabetical list of names to show you quickly who has died.

We appreciate the effort of the people who went to the trouble to contact us. In fact, many of the comments were thoughtful, some clever, and I thought you'd like to read them:

• "The positioning of obituaries in alphabetical order is dreadful and very disrespectful to the families of the deceased." --Linda M. O'Connor, Raleigh

• "I read the obituaries every morning, and for the first few mornings I assumed that there had been some horrible goof-up. When I realized after a few days that this was on purpose, I was appalled." -- Lynn Voss, Cary

• "I prefer to read the obituary column without divided notices. At my age I read the column regularly to check for my name to make sure of my status." -- William Ragsdale, Raleigh

• "I really like it alphabetical. That's wonderful. I hope you do keep it that way." -- Mary Lou Smith, Pinehurst

• "I had never realized that they were in fact alphabetized. When you get my age (78), you usually just check the ages to see how many are younger." -- Richard Roberts, Selma

• "When I'm looking at the obituaries, particularly in The N&O, I'm not looking for names. I'm scanning for people I would recognize. Most of the time, I'm just looking for who has died." -- David Harrington, Methodist minister, Farmville

• "We have subscribed to both The N&O and the Herald-Sun for about a year just to see which one to stick with. The N&O was winning. Then the N&O turned the obituary page into the same jumble of broken-up notices that the Herald-Sun has." -- Bodie McCann, Durham

• "Please give me a break! People complained because they don't have time to scour the obituary pages and they have to search for information (it's only a page or two, after all!). Good Grief!" -- Jackie Wynne, Apex

• "It ruined the old joke about the young kid who was reading the paper and, nonchalantly mentions 'I see they're still dying in alphabetical order.'" -- Julie Korzenko, Raleigh

• "I think the only franchise you have in the paper is the obituary pages and local news. About everything else you print in the paper is available somewhere else." -- Martin Green

• "I never realized that a simple cut-and-paste operation was that difficult or would spawn that much concern!" -- Paul Szudzik, Raleigh

• "The world is becoming an angrier, more dangerous, more polarized, more ecologically and economically compromised place, and there is no way we can begin to address those significant problems if everyone is focused on whether or not the obituaries should be alphabetized. No wonder the rest of the world thinks we're spoiled and self-centered." -- Patricia Walker, Raleigh

• "Change your telephone number." -- Dave Maxey, Raleigh.

The Public Editor can be reached at ted.vaden@newsobserver.com or by calling (919)-836-5700.

Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.