News & Observer | newsobserver.com |

Editorials

Prosecutors' pass

Published: Wed, Jan. 25, 2006 12:00AM

Modified Wed, Jan. 25, 2006 07:29AM

Bookmark and Share
email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

Some North Carolina district attorneys must be distressed by the N.C. State Bar's Disciplinary Hearing Commission's decision to drop serious charges against two former Union County prosecutors -- particularly since the decision rested on a technicality.

The bar's rules are that there is no deadline to charge lawyers with felonious misconduct. But the rule was never published in the state Supreme Court's minutes. Thus, on Friday, the commission dropped charges against the former prosecutors, Kenneth Honeycutt and Scott Brewer.

This case has raised understandable suspicions as to whether prosecutors, as officers of the court, are out for justice or just out to win -- any way they can. That sort of thing reflects on all prosecutors, not just on those involved in the case of Jonathan Hoffman, who was sentenced to death in 1996 for the robbery and murder of Danny Cook, owner of a jewelry store in Marshville.

Honeycutt and Brewer cut an attractive plea deal with Hoffman's cousin, Johnell Porter, who was facing some long prison terms. Porter now says he made up his testimony to get the deal. The bar said the prosecutors hid the arrangement from the trial judge and the jury, altered documents they gave the judge to conceal the deal and lied to him. Honeycutt is in private practice now; Brewer is a district court judge in Rockingham.

State Attorney General Roy Cooper can't move on his own say-so to investigate (a district attorney has to make a request), but his office has asked the bar to send its evidence of felonies to Union County District Attorney Michael Parker, who was Honeycutt's chief assistant until Honeycutt left the job. It doesn't really matter if Parker has been nominated for sainthood based on his adherence to ethics rules -- this is still a conflict of interest. He should make the necessary request to get Cooper and state investigators involved.

Hoffman has won a new trial, but the questions surrounding his prosecution need answers. An independent investigation is called for, and there must be resolution, lest the state's entire justice system be tainted by the clouds over this case.

Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.