News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Vaccines and veils

Editorials

Published: Dec 24, 2006 12:00 AM
Modified: Dec 25, 2006 06:04 AM

Vaccines and veils

 

Story Tools

Advertisements
The bugs are everywhere. But biological threats, whether natural like the Ebola virus or potentially wielded as terror weapons like anthrax, have become more dangerous and worrisome. Thus Congress and President Bush made a reasonable choice in approving a law by which private companies will be paid to develop medical treatments and vaccines to protect Americans.

The president signed the bill, crafted over two years by U.S. Sen. Richard Burr of North Carolina, into law last week. Still, the largely positive aspects of the legislation are marred by unfortunate veils of secrecy that are permitted to protect drug companies. That section needs to be revised with congressional oversight of the process in view.

Drug companies largely have abandoned making new vaccines because development costs are high while demand could be spotty. Why spend millions to develop an Ebola vaccine when outbreaks are relatively so rare? Similar dynamics are at work regarding treatments for threats such as bird flu, anthrax and chemical and radiological poisoning, all of which are targets of the law.

Burr's bill encourages public-private partnerships such as those arranged by the military for production of defense-related items that are likely to have a limited use in the marketplace. Locally, the Triangle has a number of pharmaceutical and biotechnology firms, both multinational ones and start-ups. So the new law promises to benefit this region's economy.

The law forbids disclosure of technical and scientific data developed in the course of a company's research if the disclosure would harm national security. That's sensible. The soft spot is that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is allowed to determine when a violation has occurred. A stark lesson the nation has learned since 9/11 is that combating terrorism and other national threats requires a strong dose of congressional oversight. Congress itself ought to define when disclosure of research data threatens the nation's security, and make sure the bar is not set so low that practically any disclosure is blocked.

All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published, broadcast or redistributed in any manner.
No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.


The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company