'); } -->
The standoff between the N.C. Medical Board and the state's prison officials continues, and it only becomes more complicated -- and more maddening. This is what it has come to: prison officials are filing a lawsuit to stop the Medical Board from disciplining doctors for violating a new mandate from the board that says doctors can only be present at executions, not monitor their progress or take another acts that would amount to participation.
In other words, prison officials want to exempt doctors from ethics guidelines created by a physicians' professional oversight organization. They should not interfere in the board's decision, because it is none of their business. In fact, it is an outrageous proposition.
This continues a now longstanding dispute over whether doctors violate their duty to save lives when they participate in executions, even just by monitoring inmates' vital signs as they are put to death. Wake Superior Court Judge Donald Stephens has stopped five executions (since January) because of this conflict over what a doctor's role can and cannot be. The other factor in play is a lawsuit filed that questions whether death by lethal injection may under some circumstances constitute cruel and unusual punishment because of the pain it would cause. That, of course, would violate the U.S. Constitution. It is an issue in discussion outside of North Carolina as well.
At Stephens' direction, prison officials consulted Governor Easley and the Council of State (made up of independently elected top officials) to approve a protocol for executions wherein a doctor could watch the inmate's vital signs and intervene if the process went awry. In other words, the doctor would be obliged to help save a life that the state was trying to take -- so that it could be taken later. That is...well, it's absurd. The Medical Board, thankfully, refused to come to terms with the prison officials.
Enough is enough. The General Assembly needs to call a moratorium on the death penalty until these and other issues can be settled. One year, two years, whatever it takes. The complications of the death penalty -- beyond moral objections which are legitimate -- are many, and include the potential taking of an innocent life. That risk is not worth it, period.
Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.
The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.
Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.
If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.