News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Bell turns back Stith in Durham

Published: Nov 06, 2007 07:05 PM
Modified: Nov 06, 2007 11:41 PM

Bell turns back Stith in Durham

BELL2.NE.110607.RTW
Durham mayor Bill Bell celebrates his re-election with his daughter, Kristen Bell Hughes, during a celebration at the Durham Marriott on Tuesday night, Nov. 6.

Story Tools

Advertisements
DURHAM -- Mayor Bill Bell easily defeated challenger Thomas Stith III to keep his seat for a fourth term.

Bell led Stith by a margin of 58 percentage points to 42 with 98 percent of precincts reporting.

Stith acknowledged at about 8:30 p.m. that "the trend does not look good," but stopped short of conceding.

Bell said he hoped his strong showing would discourage future candidates from running the kinds of attack ads that Stith employed.

"I hope it sends a strong message ... that using those kinds of campaign tactics, the people of Durham do not accept them," Bell said. Stith said he had no regrets about his campaign, which raised and spent more than $150,000.

"It was a hard-hitting campaign," Stith said.

"But we were dealing with serious, sensitive issues that concerned the people of Durham."

Incumbent council members Diane Catotti and Eugene Brown appeared likely to return to the council dais for second terms, earning 25 and 22 percent of the vote, respectively. Newcomer Farad Ali edged David Harris for the remaining council seat.

Closing out the City Council field were conservative challengers Laney Funderburk and Steve Monks.

The mayor's race, fueled by campaign trail sniping and six-figure spending on advertising, drew many voters to the polls.

The decision between the two boiled down to how voters felt about the current state of affairs in Durham on numerous fronts, including crime and government spending. "I think he's doing the best he can given the situation he's in," said Bell voter Nancy Sims, 51, who cited crime as her main issue.

Stith hammered Bell on crime during the campaign, saying he tolerated a level of violence in Durham that he said many Durham residents feel is unacceptable. Lori Ramsey, 41, said crime was at the top of her list of concerns, along with the property tax rate.

The registered Democrat voted for Stith knowing full well of his lifelong affiliation with the Republican Party.

"So this was a big deal for me to vote for Stith," Ramsey said as she loaded her six-month-old son and his safety seat into the car. "I just don't feel Durham is going in a direction I would want to raise my son in."

Ramsey only voted for one person for City Council out of three possibilities, and it was Catotti.

Catotti's strong performance was foreshadowed during the primary, when she was the leading vote-getter. Residents considered four bond initiatives, the largest of which gave the Durham Public Schools $194.2 million to renovate old schools and build or begin two new elementary schools, a new middle school and a new high school. Other major projects included playground upgrades and new roofs at several schools.

The money would also build a freestanding City of Medicine Academy, a small health-sciences high school that for years has been operating out of Southern High School. Another $8.68 million was designated for Durham Technical Community College for the expansion of the school's main campus on Lawson Street, upgrades including a keyless entry system and widening the school's main entrance to improve traffic problems.

The Museum of Life & Science received the go-ahead for $4.18 million in improvements to existing indoor and outdoor exhibits.

City voters also approved a $20 million bond to repave about 100 miles of streets and repair or replace three miles of sidewalks. The bond will also help pave at least half a dozen dirt roads.

All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published, broadcast or redistributed in any manner.
No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.


The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

Member of the
Real Cities Network

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company