News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Undecided voters really might not be

Published: Aug 22, 2008 12:30 AM
Modified: Aug 22, 2008 06:03 AM

Undecided voters really might not be

Study looks deep for decisiveness

 

Story Tools

Advertisements
Can't decide between Barack Obama and John McCain? Chances are your brain already has.

Using a simple word-association test to look inside voters' heads, Canadian and Italian researchers found that many voters who believe they are undecided have unconsciously made up their minds.

Inside their brains, undecideds are often partisans, although "they do not know it yet," said Bertram Gawronski, a University of Western Ontario psychologist and senior author of the study.

The researchers said it's all part of an unconscious decisiveness that manifests itself in the hundreds of mundane, snap decisions people make every day, such as choosing which shoe to put on first or which seat to take on an empty bus.

The study focused on a minor political debate in Italy, but the method is being used in an Internet experiment peering into the minds of undecided U.S. voters.

The research, published today in the journal Science, used a computerized test in which participants were asked to react as quickly as possible to images arbitrarily deemed "good" or "bad." The test measured how long it took to respond.

Scientists selected 33 residents of Vincenza, Italy, who stated that they were undecided about a proposal to expand a nearby U.S. military base.

They were instructed to press the letter "D" when they saw a picture of a military base or one of five positive words, such as joy, pleasure and happiness, and the letter "K" when they saw one of the negative words, which included pain, ugly and danger.

The researchers then reversed the test so that the image of the military base was linked to the negative words.

The theory behind the test is that people will hesitate when required to perform actions incompatible with their unconscious attitudes. So subjects who unconsciously favored the base expansion took more time to react when it was associated with negative words, and subjects against the expansion delayed when it was associated with positive words.

One week after the test, nine previously undecided subjects said they now favored the base, 10 said they had decided against it, and 14 remained undecided. Participants' responses on the week-earlier computerized test and an accompanying opinion survey were about 70 percent accurate in predicting their actual decisions, researchers said.

All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published, broadcast or redistributed in any manner.

Get $150+ in coupons in every Sunday N&O. Click here for convenient home delivery.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company