News & Observer | newsobserver.com | A Front

Published: Nov 12, 2006 12:00 AM
Modified: Nov 12, 2006 05:33 AM

Clemency sought for delusional murderer

The North Carolina inmate is part of a national debate on the executions of those with severe mental illness

Story Tools

SIMILAR CASES

Other death row inmates in North Carolina with claims of severe mental illness:

The inmate: George Page, 66, of Winston-Salem.

The crime: In February 1995, Page shot and killed Winston-Salem police Officer Stephen Amos II.

Mental illness issues: Page served 16 years in the military and is a Vietnam War veteran. He has been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder and bipolar disorder. He reported hearing voices telling him to kill someone in 1978 and suffered from hallucinations in the 1980s. At the time of the crime, his attorneys say, Page was suffering from a manic, flashback episode and began randomly shooting out of his apartment window, hitting Amos. One of the prosecution's key mental health witness later said she would have changed her testimony if shown medical records indicating that the defendant suffered from severe brain damage before the murder.

Case status: His February 2004 execution was delayed as a result of a federal lawsuit challenging North Carolina's method of execution.

The inmate: David Lynch, 46, of Gastonia.

The crime: Lynch was convicted of fatally shooting his neighbors, Bobby Anderson and his 12-year-old daughter, India, in December 1991.

Mental illness issues: Several months before the crime, Lynch checked himself in to a psychiatric hospital. He had recently driven across the country without food or sleep. He told doctors that he heard a persistent emergency tone, which others didn't hear. He told them that he had suicidal and homicidal thoughts. He also thought he was being persecuted by neighbors.

He entered an insanity plea at his trial that was rejected by the jury, which found he was not legally insane at the time of the killings.

Case status: This month, a panel of three judges at the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Va., rejected Lynch's appeal. His attorney plans to appeal to the full court.

ANDREA WEIGL

Related Content

Advertisements


< Previous page
Next page >

James E. Coleman Jr., a Duke University law professor who is pursuing clemency for LeGrande, said it is important that experts act as scientists, not advocates.

"For the process to work, everybody has to bring in competent psychiatrists with integrity to do the assessment," he said. "The courts have to make sure that happens."

In LeGrande's case, he said, that has not happened.

Killer for hire

LeGrande, 47, was born in Stanly County, east of Charlotte, the fourth of six siblings, and was raised in Philadelphia. He told jurors and doctors that he attended college for two years, he once tried out with the Philadelphia Eagles football team, he was in the Air Force for four years and he worked at a post office for six.

In 1993, LeGrande was working at a restaurant in Albemarle when he was recruited by a co-worker, Tommy Munford, to kill Munford's estranged wife for $6,500. On July 27, 1993, Munford provided the gun, dropped off LeGrande near his wife's house and took his two children to the beach to provide himself an alibi. LeGrande waited several hours, went into the house and shot Ellen Munford twice in the back.

Munford testified against LeGrande, was allowed to plead guilty to second-degree murder and was sentenced to life in prison.

Thomas Munford, the victim's son, was 6 years old when his mother was killed. He is not convinced that LeGrande suffers from mental illness, noting the hours LeGrande had to think about his crime.

"He planned out well in advance what he was going to do. He had plenty of time to sit and think on it. I don't think he's mentally ill," said Munford, 19, of Virginia Beach, Va., who plans to witness the execution.

LeGrande says he does not think his execution will happen. He insists in various letters that he will be pardoned and will receive a settlement of as much as $3 billion from the state. After his release, LeGrande has indicated, he plans to leave North Carolina and take a private jet to a tropical island. He also plans to use his settlement money to host a "first meal" with T-bone steaks, garlic bread, fresh salads and loaded baked potatoes for him, Easley and the lawyers with the Attorney General's Office who are working to see him executed.

Such grandiose thinking is a recurring theme in LeGrande's life, according to relatives, doctors and lawyers who have interacted with him over the years.

His relatives say LeGrande would have wild mood swings from calmness to extreme anger. He would rant and rave to himself and pace back and forth. LeGrande's sister and half-sister suffer from bipolar disorder and chronic paranoid schizophrenia, respectively, which his attorneys say increases his likelihood of having mental illness.

After his arrest in 1995, LeGrande insisted on being his own lawyer. A state psychiatrist concluded that LeGrande had a personality disorder with narcissistic and grandiose traits and recommended a treatment of lithium, which LeGrande refused. A state psychologist said LeGrande did not appear to suffer from bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. LeGrande was found competent to stand trial and to be his own lawyer.

Before his trial in 1996, two lawyers appointed as standby counsel asked the judge to rule that LeGrande was incompetent. They said LeGrande had "grandiose delusions" about his legal abilities, was unprepared for trial and spurned their assistance because he thought they were conspiring with prosecutors.

The trial judge asked LeGrande whether he wanted to be heard on the challenge to his competency. LeGrande said he did not and tore up the lawyer's motion. The judge refused to hear the lawyers' request.


< Previous page
Next page >

Staff writer Andrea Weigl can be reached at 829-4848 or aweigl@newsobserver.com.
No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.


The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

Member of the
Real Cities Network

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company