News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Legislators free to mold Dix Hill

Published: Jan 23, 2007 12:30 AM
Modified: Jan 23, 2007 02:25 AM

Legislators free to mold Dix Hill

The task force votes for guidelines that don't commit to a major park

Story Tools

GUIDELINES OR A PARK?

A task force on the future of the Dorothea Dix state hospital decided Monday to make only general recommendations, though two members argued it should have called for a large urban park.

IN FAVOR

Raleigh Mayor Charles Meeker, Rep. Verla Insko, Rep. Deborah Ross, Rep. Linda Coleman, Rep. Jennifer Weiss, Sen. Vernon Malone.

AGAINST

Civic activist Barbara Goodmon, Friends of Dix Park member Joseph Huberman.

ABSENT

Sen. Janet Cowell, Rep. Rick Eddins.

Advertisements
Two Wake County legislators will have wide latitude to shape the future of Dix Hill.

A task force on the Dorothea Dix hospital campus gave co-chairs Rep. Jennifer Weiss and Sen. Vernon Malone vague guidelines for drawing up a final plan.

That upset advocates who wanted the task force to endorse creating a major urban park on the 300-acre property just west of downtown Raleigh.

The guidelines call for the legislature to consider accommodating 3,000 state workers, reusing historic buildings, creating a park and allowing new commercial and residential uses with minimal state funding. But they do not provide specific details on how any of that would be done. The only specific recommendation is that money from the sale go to the state's Mental Health Trust Fund.

The task force, which met for the last time Monday, is considering what to do with the site of the state mental hospital when it closes in 2008. Last year, it hired the nonprofit Urban Land Institute to draw up a specific proposal for the property.

The guidelines mostly line up with that proposal, which called for Raleigh to create a new nonprofit to buy the land for $40 million. But they are broad enough to cover seven other plans put forward by advocates, city planners and a Charlotte design firm.

Two members argued against giving Weiss and Malone such wide leeway as they write legislation, saying the task force should take a stronger stance in favor of a major urban park.

Barbara Goodmon, president of the A.J. Fletcher Foundation, said she didn't know if the two legislators would be able to stop "wheeler-dealers" in the General Assembly from selling valuable real estate on Dix Hill to private developers.

"I feel OK about everybody in here," she said. "I don't feel OK about everybody else."

But the other six voting members of the task force at the meeting said that Weiss and Malone need room to negotiate with their colleagues in the legislature, who will make the final decision on the site.

"We have to get 61 votes in the House and 26 votes in the Senate," Weiss said. "We need flexibility."

Greg Poole, leader of the pro-park Dix Visionaries, said that the guidelines would end up creating a much smaller park on the unusable parts of the property along the Rocky Branch Creek and on top of an old city landfill.

"All they would give us as a park is wetlands and a landfill," he said.

Rep. Deborah Ross said several recommendations in the guidelines essentially call for a major park. She noted that they include making the property "a destination" and creating "active and passive recreation."

"I can't imagine in my wildest dreams that there will not be a large park up there," she said.

But task force member Joseph Huberman, who belongs to the nonprofit Friends of Dorothea Dix Park, said that the guidelines also call for considering commercial and residential uses that would undermine a park.

"This is property that belongs to the state of North Carolina, and it shouldn't be given over to private use," he said. "It certainly shouldn't be turned into a strip mall or a subdivision."

Staff writer Ryan Teague Beckwith can be reached at 836-4944 or rbeckwit@newsobserver.com.
No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.


The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Print Ads View all ads from past 7 days »

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

Member of the
Real Cities Network

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company