News & Observer | newsobserver.com |

This will hurt: Medical debt on the rise

Studies confirm what consumers can feel: Employees are taking on more debt to pay medical expenses, even as companies cover fewer insurance costs

- The New York Times

Published: Thu, Sep. 25, 2008 12:30AM

Modified Thu, Sep. 25, 2008 05:45AM

Bookmark and Share email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

Even as Washington and Wall Street debate the best way to avert an economic meltdown, more Americans are struggling with another financial crisis: unpaid medical bills.

Two studies released Wednesday provide further evidence of the toll that medical costs are increasingly placing on working families, even for those who have health insurance.

As employees pay more medical expenses out of their own pockets, they are having a harder time coming up with the money.

HEALTH INSURANCE BY THE NUMBERS

5 percent: How much health care premiums rose this year

18 percent: Workers at companies with individual coverage who have a deductible of at least $1,000

$12,680: Average annual cost of family coverage

$3,354: Average amount of the annual cost workers now pay

$4,704: Average annual cost for an individual

$721: Average amount of annual cost paid by individuals

119 percent: How much family coverage has increased since 1999

29 percent: Increase in inflation since 1999

34 percent: Increase in workers' earnings since 1999

158 million: Number of people covered by employer-sponsored health plans

(Source: Kaiser Family Foundation, McClatchy Newspapers)

The studies by the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Center for Studying Health System Change were completed this year before the financial markets reached their current state of crisis.

But policy analysts say the findings underscore the mounting strain medical care is placing on working Americans.

"The problems people are having paying for health care and health insurance are a central dimension of the economic and pocketbook concerns right now," said Drew E. Altman, president of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonprofit research group that conducts an annual survey about employer medical benefits.

The studies, policy analysts say, underscore the need for the government to address the increasing cost of care -- despite the distraction and cost to taxpayers of a proposed $700 billion bailout of the financial sector.

"This makes clear the cost of doing nothing is high and growing," said Len Nichols, a health economist at the New America Foundation, a nonpartisan policy group in Washington that advocates universal medical coverage.

Policy analysts acknowledge that finding money to expand coverage may prove difficult. However, some say the terms of the debate may be changing as policymakers and the public rethink their positions on the need for regulation and the role of the government in industry, including the health care system.

"We can now imagine a government takeover that we could not imagine before," Nichols said.

Premiums going up

Although inflation in insurance premiums has moderated in recent years, the Kaiser survey found that employees were continuing to spend more in medical costs, including their share of yearly insurance premiums.

Employees are paying an average of $3,354 in premiums for family coverage, more than double the amount they paid in 1999. The total cost for family coverage now averages $12,680 a year, up 5 percent from 2007.

As people are paying more, they are finding the higher expense less affordable. In the study by the nonpartisan Center for Studying Health System Change, based on its national survey of households, nearly one of five families had problems paying medical bills last year.

More than half of these families said they borrowed money to pay these expenses, and nearly 20 percent of those having difficulty said they contemplated declaring personal bankruptcy as a result of their medical bills.

The study estimates that 57 million Americans live in families struggling with medical bills, and 43 million of those have insurance coverage.

"It's hitting both the insured and the uninsured, and it's hitting middle-class families," said Karen Davis, president of the Commonwealth Fund, the nonprofit research organization that paid for the study.

Some families start forgoing treatments, even for serious or chronic conditions, because medical bills already have put them in debt, Davis said.

In deciding not to fill a prescription for high blood pressure pills or failing to go to the doctor for diabetes, for instance, they risk incurring more acute and costly problems that can land them in the emergency room.

"It's a serious health problem, and it's a serious economic problem," she said. As the nation moves toward greater cost-sharing of medical expenses, "what we're seeing is families are not in a position to shoulder that financial risk," she said.

Large employers remain a strong and generous source of coverage, but the Kaiser study pointed to the widening divide between employees of big companies and those at companies with fewer than 200 employees.

Virtually all large employers offered coverage, but only 62 percent of small companies did. Employees of big companies also paid less, about $3,000 a year for a family, compared with $4,100 for those at small companies.

Faced with the prospect of dropping coverage altogether, many small companies have opted for health plans that ask employees to pay higher deductibles and out-of-pocket expenses.

One in three workers in small businesses has an annual deductible of $1,000 or more, in contrast to one in five in the previous year's survey.

All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published, broadcast or redistributed in any manner.

Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.