News & Observer | newsobserver.com |

Groups cite EPA to challenge Cliffside

- Staff Writer

Published: Wed, Nov. 19, 2008 12:30AM

Modified Wed, Nov. 19, 2008 02:23AM

Bookmark and Share
email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

RALEIGH -- Critics fighting Duke Energy's proposed coal-burning power plant in Western North Carolina have renewed legal challenges to block it as a global warming threat.

The groups argue that construction on Duke's Cliffside plant should be stopped because a permit issued by the state Division of Air Quality didn't require emission controls on carbon dioxide, a major greenhouse gas.

An EPA panel recently rejected a federal permit for a Utah coal plant because it didn't consider controlling carbon dioxide emissions. The new challenges by N.C. Waste Awareness and Reduction Network in Durham and the Southern Environmental Law Center in Chapel Hill cite the EPA decision.

More than a half-dozen lawsuits and challenges have been filed against the Cliffside project in federal court.

All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published, broadcast or redistributed in any manner.

Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.

Staff writer John Murawski
No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.