News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Wal-Mart workers win class-action status

Published: Aug 08, 2007 12:00 AM
Modified: Aug 08, 2007 03:06 AM

Wal-Mart workers win class-action status

About 100,000 complaints in S.C. similar, judge decides

 

Story Tools

Advertisements
WALTERBORO, S.C. - Wal-Mart must face a class-action by South Carolina employees claiming the company forced them to work through breaks and off the clock, a judge ruled.

Current and former hourly workers from July 31, 1999, forward can sue in a single case, Judge Perry M. Buckner III in Walterboro, said. The group of about 100,000 workers is large enough and their claims similar enough to allow a class-action lawsuit, Buckner said.

"Plaintiffs' claims are typical, irrespective of varying fact patterns underlying individual claims, because they allege that they were not paid for work performed off-the-clock and were denied rest and meal breaks," Buckner wrote.

Wal-Mart faces at least 70 U.S. wage-and-hour suits by employees claiming it failed to pay for all hours worked. The South Carolina decision is the fourth since May 1 allowing similar group lawsuits. The company won a ruling in New York in June denying the status to a suit there.

"Even more courts around the country have found that cases like this are not properly suited for class treatment," said Wal-Mart spokesman John Simley. Wal-Mart doesn't have a scorecard on which cases have been denied class status because the suits are in different stages of litigation, he said.

Wal-Mart may appeal the South Carolina ruling, he said. "We are disappointed with the court's decision and are reviewing our options," Simley said.

The class-action status allows all the workers' claims to be decided in one case, increasing pressure on the company to settle, and lets workers who couldn't afford to sue on their own share in any payment for damages.

"There isn't enough money per person to make it worth the cost" of pursuing a suit individually, workers' attorney Rodney Bridgers said. "Now they're going to be able to prosecute their case for lost wages."

The workers will ask Buckner for a trial in 2008, he said.

The South Carolina workers, who filed the suit in 2001, claim "Wal-Mart, through understaffing, does not allow employees to have meal or rest breaks that they've earned," Bridgers said.

Wal-Mart also forces its employees to work without pay before and after shifts, Bridgers said. "According to Wal-Mart's own records, they're operating cash registers and other electronic devices while they're off the clock."

All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published, broadcast or redistributed in any manner.

Get $150+ in coupons in every Sunday N&O. Click here for convenient home delivery.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company