Stimulus would deepen U.S. deficit

Few talk about how to pay for plans

WASHINGTON -- As the Bush administration and Congress try to craft an economic stimulus plan, a dark cloud hangs over them: the federal deficit.

Iraq war costs of $9.6 billion a month and a gaping federal deficit that's funded by borrowing from foreign governments limit how aggressively the U.S. government can cut taxes or boost spending to fend off a recession.

Just over the horizon, a fiscal crisis that some call a day of reckoning looms larger.

Statistics released Wednesday by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office show that the federal deficit -- the gap between what the government spends and the revenue it collects -- is projected to leap to $250 billion in the current budget year. That's up 53 percent from the $163 billion deficit in fiscal 2007.

If Congress approves the roughly $140 billion economic stimulus plan now being discussed, the deficit for this fiscal year, which began Oct. 1, could swell to almost $400 billion.

The CBO presented those estimates to Congress on Wednesday as part of its budget and economic outlook for 2008 to 2018.

"Ongoing increases in health-care costs, along with the aging of the population, are expected to put substantial pressure on the budget in coming decades," Director Peter Orszag told the House Budget Committee. "Those trends are already evident in the current projection period."

Paying for the bill

Lawmakers can sharply cut government spending, sharply raise taxes or pass some combination of spending cuts and tax increases, Orszag said.

The Bush administration frequently notes that although the deficit is high, it's low in historical terms as a percentage of the total economy -- 1.5 percent this budget year, according to CBO estimates.

That's true. But it's a snapshot of the moment. Seen in the context of what lies ahead, the deficit puts the U.S. economy on a weaker footing to address the fiscal challenges that successive Congresses have ducked.

Some economists say that to avoid passing the fiscal burden to future generations, lawmakers and President Bush should propose ways to pay for the stimulus -- a combination of tax rebates for consumers and tax relief for business -- over a longer time frame.

"If we do something right now like a tax rebate and a couple of other things, it would be sensible to pay for it over a five-year period or something like that," said Alice Rivlin, a former vice chairman of the Federal Reserve who's now a senior researcher at the Brookings Institution, a center-left policy research organization.

This month, the rating agency Moody's Investors Service warned that if Congress didn't address the expected budget strains associated with Social Security and Medicare, U.S. government bonds could lose their AAA rating. Investors then would demand higher interest rates to reflect a greater risk of a U.S. government default on its debt obligations, further eroding the nation's fiscal outlook.

But the negotiations between Bush and Congress on the stimulus package include little discussion about how to pay for it.

Democrats and Republicans alike suggest that a temporary economic spark prompted by the right kind of stimulus should produce tax revenues to replace what the Treasury is losing.

They're right. But only if the U.S. economy doesn't fall into a recession before the stimulus takes effect. If recession strikes, there would be even less incoming revenue and a bigger federal deficit.