News & Observer | newsobserver.com |

Basrah fight puts Maliki to the test

Bold moves from a cautious leader

- The Associated Press

Published: Fri, Mar. 28, 2008 12:30AM

Modified Fri, Mar. 28, 2008 06:12AM

Bookmark and Share
email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

BAGHDAD -- The widening clashes between Iraqi forces and Shiite militiamen are a defining moment for U.S.-backed Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

Al-Maliki, in office since May 2006, is almost certain to pay a heavy political price if he fails against Shiite militias in battles that began in the southern city of Basrah and then flared in Baghdad and other cities.

He knows the stakes are high. He has promised not to compromise and vowed to battle to the end against the Mahdi Army militia led by anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr.

BASRAH MILITIAS

Shiite militias have been fighting among themselves for years to control neighborhoods, oil revenues, electricity access, the ports and even the local universities. Here are the three main rivals:

Mahdi Army: Al-Sadr founded the militia soon after the U.S.-led invasion in 2003. It has grown into one of the most powerful armed groups in Iraq by offering both protection and social welfare services to impoverished Shiites. Its seven-month cease-fire has helped reduce the level of violence in Iraq.

Badr Organization: The armed wing of the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council, a political party that is a crucial member of the coalition keeping al-Maliki in power. The Badr Organization is one of the most powerful rivals of the Mahdi Army in Basrah.

Fadhila: A party that split from the Sadrists years ago and has its own militia.

The three groups are expected to be rivals in the next round of provincial council elections, now scheduled for October.

(THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, THE NEW YORK TIMES)

WHO IS AL-SADR?

The anti-American Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, in his early 30s, is the son of the late Grand Ayatollah Mohammed Sadiq al-Sadr, one of the most powerful Shiite clerics in Iraq in the 1990s. The younger al-Sadr fiercely opposes the U.S. presence in Iraq and launched two major uprisings against American-led forces in 2004. He ordered his fighters to stand down in August, but the cease-fire has been severely strained.

That's a bold position, considering the fight so far.

The Iraqi campaign in Basrah -- launched this week to uproot Mahdi Army's influence in the important oil center -- has been bogged down in the face of strong resistance.

But al-Maliki appears unshaken and has turned the fight into a personal test.

He has traveled to Basrah, 340 miles south of Baghdad, to take personal charge of the operation -- the first major battle waged by Iraqi forces alone without strong U.S. backup. It's a gambit with clear fallout for al-Maliki if Iraqi security forces come up short.

His political standing would be seriously bruised at a time when he is attempting to play unifier between the nation's three fractious groups: majority Shiites, Sunni Arabs and Kurds.

Sunni leaders, who complain of being sidelined by al-Maliki's government, could feel emboldened and press harder for al-Maliki's ouster. Even the prime minister's main coalition partner -- the powerful Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council -- has recently been dropping hints that it disapproves of al-Maliki.

Proof's in the pudding

Much now rides on the outcome of the showdown against the Mahdi Army, the main rival of the Supreme Council in the Shiite heartland in southern Iraq.

"If the [Iraqi government forces] cannot gradually get some control over Basrah, of course al-Maliki will lose prestige," said Phebe Marr, a historian on Iraqi affairs and senior fellow at the U.S. Institute of Peace in Washington.

But she believes his main Shiite allies will not quickly abandon him regardless of how events play out against the Mahdi Army.

A senior aide said al-Sadr is seeking a political solution. In a statement relayed by Hazem al-Aaraji, al-Sadr said he wants "everyone to pursue political solutions and peaceful protests and a stop to the shedding of Iraqi blood."

The crisis came to a head following months of U.S. and Iraqi raids that detained hundreds of Mahdi Army fighters even as the militia maintained its self-proclaimed truce -- which Washington has credited for helping bring down violence since last August.

But the timing also suggests an attempt to take a swipe at al-Sadr before the Pentagon scales back its forces in coming months, from 158,000 to about 140,000.

There is no doubt, however, that al-Maliki is acting with uncharacteristic daring.

His hallmark until now has been caution. Al-Maliki has been careful not to anger his Shiite political base by pushing too hard for U.S.-backed reforms, including bringing more Sunni Arabs into the security forces.

At times, Washington's patience with al-Maliki has appeared to be wearing thin. But the tone changed after Iraqi forces pushed into Basrah.

White House press secretary Dana Perino said Tuesday that al-Maliki showed bravery by committing his forces to the fight. "I would characterize it as a bold decision -- precisely what the critics have asked to see in Iraq," she said.

President Bush, speaking Thursday to a military audience in Dayton, Ohio, said Iraq's leaders should be given time to reconcile differences and applauded them for showing "great courage" against their foes.

Despite the fighting Bush argued that "normalcy is returning back to Iraq," saying that last year's U.S. troop "surge" has improved Iraq's security to the point where political and economic progress are blossoming as well.

All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published, broadcast or redistributed in any manner.

Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.