News & Observer | newsobserver.com |

Wright guilty of obstruction of justice

- The Charlotte Observer

Published: Thu, Aug. 28, 2008 12:30AM

Modified Thu, Aug. 28, 2008 05:31AM

Bookmark and Share email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

RALEIGH -- Former state Rep. Thomas Wright has become the latest public figure in North Carolina convicted of violating campaign finance laws.

A Wake County jury found the Wilmington Democrat guilty Wednesday of obstruction of justice related to a number of campaign irregularities. Investigators say he failed to report $150,000 in campaign contributions over six years, pocketing most of the money for himself.

The case represents the most recent example of public corruption in the state capital.

CHRONOLOGY

DECEMBER 2006 : Former Democratic consultant Joe Sinsheimer files an elections board complaint against Rep. Thomas Wright, a Wilmington Democrat, asking the panel to investigate whether Wright hid campaign contributions.

FEB. 28, 2007: State Board of Elections officials asks Wright for bank records.

MARCH 12, 2007: Wright resigns his leadership positions in the state House.

MAY 15, 2007: The State Board of Elections votes unanimously to ask the Wake County district attorney to consider filing criminal charges against Wright over his handling of hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions.

MAY 22-23, 2007: House Speaker Joe Hackney and Gov. Mike Easley call on Wright to resign.

DEC. 10, 2007: A Wake County grand jury indicts Wright on charges of swindling banks, corporations and campaign contributors out of more than $350,000.

MARCH 3, 2008: As an ethics hearing on Wright begins in the state House, Wright's attorney argues that the legislator is the victim of a "Jim Crow hearing," treated unfairly because he is black.

MARCH 5, 2008: Two state investigators testify that Wright accepted thousands of dollars from a charitable foundation but deposited it into a personal account, and that the legislator failed to disclose campaign contributions from interests that the legislature regulates.

MARCH 20, 2008: The N.C. House votes overwhelmingly to expel Wright -- a dishonor no N.C. legislator has faced since 1880.

APRIL 7, 2008: Wright is convicted in Wake County on three felony counts of obtaining property by false pretenses and sent to prison until at least 2014.

AUG. 27, 2008: A Wake County jury convicts Wright of obstruction of justice.

Wake District Attorney Colon Willoughby said the case highlights the need for change. "Our campaign finance laws cry out for some overhaul," he said.

Most campaign finance law violations are misdemeanors under state law. Willoughby called for more tools for prosecutors, such as the ability to convene an investigative grand jury. He said the penalties should be more severe.

"We've seen some pretty egregious examples that don't fit a misdemeanor," he said.

State lawmakers have considered such proposals for years. They have never passed.

Rep. Melanie Wade Goodwin, chairwoman of the House committee on campaign finance law, said Wednesday that lawmakers need to balance penalties with other concerns.

"We want to make sure that we don't make it so hostile to potential candidates that we can't get people to run for office," said Goodwin, a Richmond County Democrat. "And we also want to make sure we don't create felony penalties for everything so that we've got so many in prison for campaign finance violations that we don't have room for people who commit violent crimes."

Joe Sinsheimer, a former Democratic campaign consultant who complained about Wright to the State Board of Elections in 2006, said Wright was brought down by "arrogance, hubris and greed."

"The indictments and convictions will continue until either the leadership of the General Assembly decides to change the culture of the institution or voters adopt a 'throw-the-bums-out' mentality," Sinsheimer wrote in e-mail. "Neither seems imminent, although both would be welcome."

Concurrent sentence

A series of state public officials have been convicted of campaign finance crimes in recent years. Former House Speaker Jim Black, a Matthews Democrat, pleaded guilty to taking cash from chiropractors during secret bathroom meetings. Former Agriculture Commissioner Meg Scott Phipps pleaded guilty to pressuring state fair operators into giving campaign contributions.

Wright, 53, was once among the most powerful members of the House, ranking eighth in one survey of effectiveness after the 2001 legislative session.

In March, he became the first North Carolina lawmaker expelled from office since the 19th century, after his indictment for fraud and obstruction of justice. He was convicted of fraud in April -- in connection with a $150,000 bank loan and $7,400 meant for charity -- and sentenced to as long as eight years in prison.

Wright's conviction Wednesday will not add any time to his sentence. Judge Donald Stephens sentenced Wright to six to eight months, to be served at the same time as the earlier sentence.

"I don't think it's in the state's interests to extend the time of his incarceration," Willoughby told the judge.

Still, Willoughby defended his decision to bring the case to trial. He said the state began investigating Wright because of campaign finances, not because of other fraud.

Wright's attorney, Doug Harris of Greensboro, said his client would appeal the conviction, as he is doing with the convictions from April. He said Stephens took away any chance that the jury would acquit Wright.

"It was impossible to win based on the instructions the jury was given," Harris said.

Stephens and Harris disagreed Wednesday on how to answer a question from the jury, which had asked for a definition of "intent to defraud." Stephens provided an entry from Black's Law Dictionary and, over Harris' objection, explained to jurors how it might fit Wright's case.

About 20 minutes later, jurors returned with their verdict. Altogether, they deliberated for about 2 1/2 hours Tuesday and Wednesday.

Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.