'); } -->
RALEIGH -- The two candidates for state auditor each say the other will bring partisanship to a job that is supposed to be above politics.
The auditor is the state's lead watchdog on waste and abuse of taxpayers' money. Incumbent Republican Les Merritt says he has been aggressive about watching the public's money. That, he adds, has led critics in state government, largely controlled by Democrats, to accuse him of pushing a political agenda.
"If you really do your job, occasionally you're going to be in certain areas where you're going to have people really push back at you," Merritt said. "I've got some scars to really show that."
AGE: 54
RESIDENCE: Raleigh
FAMILY: Single
EDUCATION: Accounting degree, East Carolina University, 1984
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Certified public accountant; worked in office of N.C. state auditor, 1996-2007; teaches professional courses for the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the N.C. Association of Certified Public Accountants.
POLITICAL RESUME: This is her first run for office.
WEB SITE: www.bethwoodcampaign.com
AGE: 56
RESIDENCE: Zebulon
FAMILY: Married with two adult children
EDUCATION: Bachelor's degrees in economics and accounting, N.C. State University
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Certified public accountant and certified financial planner; president of Merritt, Petway, Mills and Hockaday, an accounting firm with offices in Raleigh and Zebulon
POLITICAL RESUME: Wake County Board of Commissioners, 1994 to 1998; elected state auditor, 2004
WEB SITE: www.auditormerritt.com
His opponent, Beth Wood, a former training director in the State Auditor's Office, said Merritt has opened himself up to the criticism.
"Not until Les Merritt came to work there did we start to hear 'Republican versus Democrat,' " Wood said.
"If people believe that the audits are done in a partisan way -- they're not objective, they're not independent, somebody's got some foregone conclusion -- there's no credibility to the audit."
Perceptions of audits matter because although the auditor's office has the right to inspect the books, it has little power to act on findings of waste or misuse. The auditor is charged with watching state money, including how nonprofit organizations spend state dollars.
The candidates are both certified public accountants with experience in the State Auditor's Office. Merritt has four years as auditor, and Wood worked for 11 years in the office's training division, before leaving in 2007.
Merritt counts among his accomplishments streamlining the way the office operates, reducing a backlog of investigative audits and implementing a training program to help nonprofit agencies comply with accounting rules.
Wood says she wants to make audits easier for the legislature and the public to understand, improve the training for auditors in the office and restore public trust in the office.
Wood said Merritt opened himself to criticism of bias in 2007 when he urged the legislature to delay a bill that would let voters register days before an election. Merritt's staff was working on an audit that seemed to show irregularities in the state's voter rolls, including an allegation that some voters were dead. Merritt later backed away from the findings. He was accused of pushing a Republican agenda.
Merritt says he made the call to tell lawmakers about the incomplete audit because he worried that if the findings turned out to be true, lawmakers needed to know before they changed the law.
"I think there was a better way to handle that," Merritt said. "It wasn't partisan, but it sure did lead into some accusations."
Wood said the incident showed that Merritt can let politics influence his decisions. But in her campaign material, Wood has emphasized partisan politics as well. In e-mail to supporters, she touted the momentum in her campaign.
"With your support," she wrote, "we can maintain this lead and 'Take this Seat Back!' "
Wood said that the message was addressed to Democrats but that her record shows she will be objective as auditor.
"I can tell you that my record in the State Auditor's Office ... will show you that I've never done anything in a partisan way," she said.
The next four years may be challenging for the state auditor.
Economic forecasters are predicting the national economic slowdown will reduce state revenues, which would place even more pressure on eliminating wasteful spending. The office has a large number of employees nearing retirement age, and the next auditor may have to worry about losing the most experienced employees.
And the office is currently in a legal battle with the N.C. State Ethics Commission, which sued Merritt in August. The commission wants a judge to prevent Merritt from investigating a claim of preferential treatment for Lt. Gov. Beverly Perdue, the Democratic nominee for governor.
The suit says that Merritt has a conflict of interest because his investigations chief once worked for the commission. The suit follows an escalating feud between Merritt and the commission over jurisdiction.
"How we ended up in nuclear war instead of just solving the thing, it's kind of hard to understand," Merritt said. "You can't back off. You can't let anybody back you down, but at the same time, you can disagree but not be disagreeable."
Wood said she would ask a national state auditor's group to select a Republican and a Democrat from out of state to investigate the case.
Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.
The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.
Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.
If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.