'); } -->
President Bush said no Wednesday to expanded embryonic stem cell research, but North Carolina legislators were jumping into the fight.
Bush vetoed a bill that would have loosened restrictions on spending federal money to use human embryos to develop cures for diseases. About the same time, Rep. Jim Gulley, a Mecklenburg County Republican whose hands shake from Parkinson's disease, was arguing for state money to be used on stem cell research.
Bush opposes destroying human embryos. Gulley told a House committee that he opposes abortion, too. But embryonic stem cells are a separate issue, he said.
Cell requirements: They would come from in vitro fertility clinics with the consent of the individual donors. They would have to be cells that would never be implanted and would otherwise be discarded.
Money: $10 million would go to the Health and Wellness Trust Fund, to be distributed as grants of $1 million or less. Grant recipients must match the state money.
To learn more about the bill, go to:
www.ncleg.net/gascripts/ BillLookUp/BillLookUp.pl (type in H1837)
EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS
From embryo three to five days after fertilization when it's a hollow ball of cells called a blastocyst.
Pros: Can become any cell in the body
Cons: Embryo destruction causes ethical concerns; limits federal funding.
AMNIOTIC STEM CELLS
From fluid surrounding a developing embryo; researchers are working to determine the full range of cells they could become.
Pros: Easily obtained through amniocentesis.
Cons: Adaptations of the cells are not known, but promising.
CORD BLOOD STEM CELLS
Saved from umbilical cord at childbirth; similar to cells found in adult bone marrow.
Pros: Obtained without harm.
Cons: Are not adaptable for treating anything but blood diseases.
ADULT STEM CELLS
Obtained from bone marrow, other cell-producing tissues; research continuing to see if they can be as versatile as embryonic stem cells.
Pros: Federal research funding not restricted.
Cons: Can only produce the same type of cell from which the came.
U.S. NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH, INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR STEM CELL RESEARCH, WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY, MCT
The North Carolina measure cleared the House Science and Technology Committee, where a majority of members wanted to join a handful of states that provide their own research money for stem cell research. Faced with limits on federal spending, California voters approved $3 billion in state spending in 2004, and about a half-dozen other states have spent or pledged smaller amounts.
North Carolina proponents propose spending $10 million, a fraction of what's been committed in some other states, but comparable to amounts spent in Illinois and Maryland.
The North Carolina bill's supporters emphasized that only embryos a few days old that are left over from fertilization clinics could be used under the proposed state policy. Tens of thousands of cells sit in freezers and would otherwise be discarded as medical waste, supporters said.
"This bill comes down to what to do with the embryos that are left over after in vitro fertilization," Gulley said. "Do you flush them or do you use them to find a cure for people like me?"
The measure had detractors who said that the potential to cure disease is not certain and that support should instead go to stem cell research that does not destroy embryos.
Rep. Marilyn Avila, a Wake County Republican, said she takes pills and three shots a day to control her diabetes. Yet, she said she could not in clear conscience accept that a cure might come at the cost of a human life.
"Embryonic stem cells have a possible potential for curing disease. Nothing is proven," she said. "They have an absolute potential to become human life."
Rep. Earl Jones, a Greensboro Democrat, said political support for the research has had to advance in small steps. This is the third legislative session in which Jones has tried to get his colleagues to back state funding for such research. Until Wednesday, he had not been able to even get the support of a legislative committee.
In an effort to educate his legislative colleagues, Jones led a panel last year that had ethicists, scientists and lobbyists talk about stem cell research.
"You can put more money in, but you have to take a step at a time," said Jones, a self-professed science enthusiast who leads the House science committee that approved the bill Wednesday.
If North Carolina supports embryonic stem cell studies, he said, it will stand out among its Southeastern neighbors and attract scientists and more private grants to a state already rich with technology.
Jones' bill still has a long way to go. Another House committee must approve it before it gets to a vote of all House members. If the bill wins approval there, it goes to the Senate.
North Carolina's interest has gained national attention from both supporters and opponents. Members of Hadassah, a volunteer women's organization, have asked legislators in the last few years to support the research.
Marla Gilson, the group's Washington lobbyist, was disappointed with the Bush veto. But she applauded North Carolina for moving to back stem cell research, even with a small amount of money.
"If the state legislature puts itself out there on record to say this is an important goal for North Carolina," she said, "in the absence of anything else, something is better than nothing."
Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.
The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.
Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.
If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.