News & Observer | newsobserver.com |

Edwards gambles on attacking Clinton

Warns against trading 'corporate Republicans for corporate Democrats'

- Staff Writer

Published: Wed, Nov. 21, 2007 12:00AM

Modified Wed, Nov. 21, 2007 04:54AM

Bookmark and Share
email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA -- John Edwards is not finding many nice things to say about Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, a rival for the Democratic presidential nomination.

Clinton won't promise to end American combat missions in Iraq, Edwards says. She is helping the Bush administration pave the way for military action in Iran. And she is too cozy with the Washington lobbyists, from whom she accepts campaign contributions.

"Does anyone here believe that if we trade a crowd of corporate Republicans for corporate Democrats, there will be any change in Washington, D.C.?" Edwards asked more than 1,000 people packed into the Cole College auditorium in Cedar Rapids on Monday night.

EDWARDS ON CLINTON

"Senator Clinton has a long history of speaking out on behalf of women. She deserves to be commended for that. But I believe that on the issues that directly affect women's lives, I have the strongest, boldest ideas and can bring about the change that needs to be brought."

YouTube debate, Charleston, S.C., July 23

"Senator Clinton says that she believes she can be the candidate for change, but she defends a broken system that's corrupt in Washington, D.C. She says she will end the war, but she continues to say she'll keep combat troops in Iraq and continue combat missions in Iraq. To me, that's not ending the war; that's the continuation of the war."

Democratic presidential debate,

Philadelphia, Oct. 30

"On the issue of Social Security, she said, standing beside me on the stage, that she would not do anything about the cap on Social Security taxes, and she has said privately to people, because it's been reported in the press, that in fact she would consider raising that cap."

Democratic presidential debate,

Las Vegas, Nov. 15

"She says she will turn up the heat on George Bush and the Republicans, but when the crucial vote came on stopping Bush, Cheney and the neocons on Iran, she voted with Bush and Cheney."

Democratic presidential debate,

Las Vegas, Nov. 15

COMPILED BY NEWS RESEARCHER DENISE JONES

Related Content

"Noooo," is the cry of a crowd that had been warmed up by performers Bonnie Raitt and Jackson Browne with the song, "Thing Called Love."

Edwards has not been filled with a lot of love toward Clinton in recent weeks, becoming the most aggressive Democratic hopeful in going after the New York senator. Now, the other Democratic presidential hopefuls are beginning to fire back. Edwards has gone from the hunter to the hunted.

Clinton accuses Edwards of "throwing mud." Illinois Sen. Barack Obama's campaign says Edwards is full of inconsistencies, citing Edwards' current support for organized labor after backing North Carolina's anti-union, right-to-work law when he ran for the Senate in 1998. New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson accuses Edwards of trying to start "a class war."

"I'm surprised at just how angry John has become," Connecticut Sen. Chris Dodd said recently. "That is not the same John Edwards I once knew."

The new aggressiveness is a gamble for Edwards as he heads toward the crucial Jan. 3 Iowa caucuses that could make or break his White House ambitions.

A new ABC News/ Washington Post poll released this week found that the race continues to be tight in Iowa. Obama was the choice of 30 percent of Iowa Democrats surveyed from Nov. 14 to 18, while Clinton was the choice of 26 percent, and Edwards was the favorite of 22 percent. The margin of error was plus or minus 4.5 percentage points. A poll for CBS News and The New York Times, released last week, found that Clinton, Edwards and Obama are locked in a statistical dead heat.

Clinton has, for the most part, ignored Edwards' attacks. At a campaign appearance in Iowa this week, Clinton made no mention of Edwards.

Edwards and Clinton do not differ significantly on most issues. But Edwards has tried to cast himself as an outsider who will push for change, while depicting Clinton as part of the entrenched Washington establishment.

'All his negativity'

Edwards' recent aggressiveness -- a dramatic change from the sunny optimism that marked his 2004 run for the presidency -- has sparked mixed reaction among Iowa voters.

Edwards' attacks have turned off voters such as Evelyn Bland, 63, a farmer's wife from Shellsburg. She had been considering voting for Edwards but now says she will back Clinton.

"All his negativity with Clinton, that turned me off," said Bland, who attended a Clinton rally Monday in Vinton. "I want them to tell me about what they are going to do, not what someone has done in the past."

But Ron Levine, 56, a data system analyst from Cedar Rapids, says Edwards is OK as long as he doesn't engage in personal attacks. Levine says he is trying to choose between Edwards and Obama.

"I don't like negative campaigning," Levine said at an Edwards rally in Cedar Rapids. "But I don't feel like he has crossed the line"

Edwards appears to be tapping into some anti-Washington anger.

"I'm disappointed that he has not been more assertive with Hillary," said Jules Cohen, 71, a retired owner of a paper company from Bettendorf. "While Bush was robbing the bank, she [Clinton] was driving the getaway car."

rob.christensen@newsobserver.com or (919) 829-4532

Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.