News & Observer | newsobserver.com |

Johnston hunting for books to remove

School officials pull one found offensive

- Staff Writer

Published: Fri, Dec. 14, 2007 12:00AM

Modified Sat, Dec. 15, 2007 08:16AM

Bookmark and Share email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

After banning a popular coming-of-age tale, Johnston County school officials are scouring library shelves for other potentially offensive books to remove.

The district review was prompted by a parent challenge to "How the Garcia Girls Lost Their Accents," which was removed from school libraries and classrooms this fall. The novel by Julia Alvarez has faced challenges in at least four districts nationwide for its sexual content and profane language, though national observers knew of no other district where parents succeeded in having it banned.

It has not been challenged or banned in other Triangle districts, though it is in several high school libraries across the region and is taught in at least one Durham school.

PUBLIC SHUT OUT

The Johnston school board met in a closed session in October before asking school employees to review high school reading materials.

North Carolina public records law allows public bodies to hold closed sessions only to discuss certain topics, including personnel issues, potential land purchases or legal matters.

Curriculum issues -- what should or should not be taught in schools -- are not exempt from open meetings laws.

Superintendent Tony Parker said the closed discussion was legal because it dealt with personnel issues.

Parker said it was later determined that it was not about personnel and no one was ever disciplined.

WHY TEACHERS SUPPORT THE BOOK

"How the Garcia Girls Lost Their Accents," by Julia Alvarez, is suggested reading by the National Council of Teachers of English. Here is part of the rationale in support of the book:

* Recognized by the Young Adult Library Services Association as a popular paperback for teens ages 12 to 18.

* Explores themes of moving to a new place and having to make new friends, a theme common in the lives of young adults.

* Characters have to learn a new language, deal with bullies and teasing, discover sexuality. The universality of these themes is such that most readers will find connection to their own experience. Latino students and students form other cultures, in particular, may identify with the characters.

* Multicultural literature has been praised as "a powerful tool to help students develop an understanding and respect for individuals of all cultures while at the same time gaining an appreciation of their own cultural and literary heritage."

* Students develop sensitivity to others and an understanding of issues related to immigration and cultural assimilation.

Compared by some to a modern "Little Women," the book recounts history and social change through the eyes of four sisters from the Dominican Republic growing up in New York City. Objections to the book include a number of sexual scenes, including one involving a sculptor and a statue of the Virgin Mary, as well as profanity and references to drug use.

In the wake of the Johnston challenge, the school board asked administrators to check all of the books in high school libraries and classrooms against lists of commonly challenged books to weed out other offensive material. Several organizations compile these lists, including the American Library Association. The review is likely to last months.

"I don't think that kind of literature should be in our schools," said Fred Bartholomew, who was chairman of the board when it made the decision in October.

Anthony Roberts of Four Oaks initiated the challenge to "Garcia Girls" after his 15-year-old daughter showed him passages from the book, assigned reading for her English class at West Johnston High School. In the challenge, Roberts and his wife said the book promotes sexuality among teenagers and is "filling their minds with filth and profanity." Asked what they thought its theme was, they replied "pornography."

"She brought it to our attention and was very uncomfortable with the content of the book, and we agreed with her," Roberts said of his daughter.

His daughter was given an alternative assignment, but the Robertses continued to press for the book's removal. A school committee denied their request, but a district committee reversed the decision.

A right to opt out

Deborah Caldwell-Stone, deputy director of the American Library Association's Office of International Freedom, said such challenges are often brought by parents who read excerpts of a book out of context, without considering the work's overall merit.

"We support a parent's right to opt their children out of assignments," she said. "But their objections shouldn't deny other children and young adults the opportunity to read those novels and to grapple with them in their English classes under the guidance of a teacher."

Johnston requires teachers to clear book choices through school libraries, particularly if they have not been used, said Keith Beamon, associate superintendent for curriculum and instruction. The district review is intended to ward off future challenges, he said.

Beamon said an appearance on a list of challenged books won't necessarily lead to a book's removal. "We would look at it," Beamon said.

Many districts are scrutinizing the choices of teachers and librarians as challenges to books and movies become more common, said Vinetta Bell, an English and language arts consultant for the state Department of Public Instruction. Bell cites a renewed focus on morality and religious values as one reason for the jump. Another, she said, is the broadening of school reading selections beyond the work of well-known white, male authors of the literary canon.

marti.maguire@newsobserver.com or (919) 829-4841

Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.