News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Detainee abuse began early

Nation & World

Published: Jun 16, 2008 12:30 AM
Modified: Jun 18, 2008 07:43 PM

Detainee abuse began early

U.S. soldiers beat prisoners to get revenge for the Sept. 11 attacks

Story Tools

ABOUT BAGRAM

Originally intended as a short-term holding pen for al-Qaida and Taliban suspects in Afghanistan who would later be shipped to Guantanamo, the prison at Bagram has expanded and acquired its own notoriety over abuse allegations.

Bagram's 500 to 600 inmates are mostly Afghans but are also thought to include Arabs, Pakistanis and some Central Asians. They wear the same orange jumpsuits and shaven heads as the "enemy combatants" at Guantanamo.

N&O ARCHIVES

ABOUT THE SERIES

Early in 2007, as the Bush administration said it intended to release most of the detainees from the prison at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba, McClatchy Newspapers set out to track down the freed prisoners to learn who they were and what happened to them in the prisons the U.S. set up in Afghanistan and Cuba.

Reporters Tom Lasseter and Matthew Schofield interviewed 66 former detainees in 11 countries. They also interviewed political and military officials to establish the detainees' backgrounds and check their stories.

Lasseter and Schofield also combed through unclassified transcripts of the men's tribunal hearings at Guantanamo, when available, and Lasseter interviewed former White House and Department of Defense officials, former guards and prisoners' attorneys.

THE SERIES

SUNDAY: Prison camp snared the lowly, unlucky

MONDAY: Detainee abuse began early

TUESDAY: Detainees learned to hate the U.S.

WEDNESDAY: End run around law led to abuses

TODAY: Wily mullah led revolt inside prison

AP NEWS VIDEO


Requires Internet Explorer
Advertisements
******

CORRECTION

A McClatchy Newspapers story on Page 1A Monday about the abuse of detainees at U.S. bases in Afghanistan incorrectly implied that concertina wire is used to corral livestock. The livestock comparison was meant to refer to the size and character of the holding pens that the detainees were kept in.

******

Second of five parts

KABUL, Afghanistan -- American soldiers herded the detainees into holding pens of razor-sharp concertina wire, the kind that's used to corral livestock.

The guards kicked, kneed and punched many of the men until they collapsed in pain. U.S. troops shackled and dragged other detainees to small isolation rooms, then hung them by their wrists from chains dangling from the wire mesh ceiling at the Bagram Air Base detention camp.

Former guards and detainees whom McClatchy interviewed said Bagram was a center of systematic brutality for at least 20 months, starting in late 2001. Yet the soldiers responsible have escaped serious punishment.

The public outcry in the United States and abroad has focused on detainee abuse at the U.S. naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, but sadistic violence first appeared at Bagram, north of Kabul, and at a similar U.S. internment camp at Kandahar Airfield in southern Afghanistan.

The eight-month McClatchy investigation found a pattern of abuse that continued for years. The abuse of detainees at Bagram has been reported by U.S. media organizations, in particular The New York Times, which broke several developments in the story. But the extent of the mistreatment, and that it eclipsed the alleged abuse at Guantanamo, hasn't previously been revealed.

Attacks were common

Guards said they routinely beat their prisoners to retaliate for al-Qaida's Sept. 11 attacks, unaware that the vast majority of the detainees had little or no connection to al-Qaida.

Former detainees at Bagram and Kandahar said they were beaten regularly. Of the 41 former Bagram detainees whom McClatchy interviewed, 28 said that guards or interrogators had assaulted them. Only eight of those men said they were beaten at Guantanamo Bay.

Because President Bush loosened or eliminated the rules governing the treatment of so-called enemy combatants, however, few U.S. troops have been disciplined under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and no serious punishments have been administered, even in the cases of two detainees who died after American guards beat them.

In an effort to assemble as complete a picture as possible of U.S. detention practices, McClatchy reporters interviewed 66 former detainees, double-checked key elements of their accounts, spoke with U.S. soldiers who had served as detention camp guards and reviewed thousands of pages of records from Army courts-martial and human rights reports.

The Bush administration refuses to release full records of detainee treatment in the war on terrorism, and no senior Bush administration official would agree to an on-the-record interview to discuss McClatchy's findings.

The brutality at Bagram peaked in December 2002, when U.S. soldiers beat two Afghan detainees, Habibullah and Dilawar, to death as they hung by their wrists.

Dilawar died Dec. 10, seven days after Habibullah died. He had been hit in his leg so many times that the tissue was "falling apart" and had "basically been pulpified," said then-Lt. Col. Elizabeth Rouse, the Air Force medical examiner who performed the autopsy on him.

The only American officer who has been reprimanded for the deaths of Habibullah and Dilawar is Army Capt. Christopher Beiring, who commanded the 377th Military Police Company from the summer of 2002 to the spring of 2003.


Next page >

All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published, broadcast or redistributed in any manner.

Get $150+ in coupons in every Sunday N&O. Click here for convenient home delivery.

Matthew Schofield contributed to this report.
No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company