News & Observer | newsobserver.com |

Nation & World

GOP sparring hits new level of nasty

- McClatchy Newspapers

Published: Fri, Nov. 30, 2007 12:00AM

Modified Fri, Nov. 30, 2007 03:01AM

Bookmark and Share
email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

WASHINGTON -- Remember Ronald Reagan's famed 11th commandment, do not speak ill of fellow Republicans? It looks as if this year's presidential candidates have forgotten it.

At Wednesday's CNN/YouTube debate, former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani accused former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney of running a "sanctuary mansion" because Romney had illegal immigrants doing yard work at his home. Earlier in the week, Giuliani's campaign manager called Romney a "mediocre one-term governor."

Romney has lambasted Giuliani's judgment in hiring as police commissioner Bernard Kerik, who was indicted on corruption charges recently. Both candidates routinely accuse each other of resembling Hillary Clinton, perhaps the unkindest cut of all among Republicans.

CNN UNDER FIRE

CNN said Thursday that it would redouble its efforts to vet the campaign affiliations of questioners at open-forum debates, after a retired brigadier general was permitted Wednesday to ask the Republican presidential candidates about gay men and lesbians in the military without CNN's knowing that he was listed on an advisory committee of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign.

"I think it's pretty obvious, in retrospect, our search should have turned this up," Jon Klein, the president of CNN's U.S. networks, said in an interview.

THE NEW YORK TIMES

There have always been occasional edgy skirmishes in Republican primary campaigns: "Stop lying about my record," Kansas Sen. Bob Dole snarled to George H.W. Bush in 1988. A vicious whispering campaign against Arizona Sen. John McCain in South Carolina in 2000 suggested that McCain was crazy and the father of an illegitimate black child. (The author of that campaign was never identified, but it helped save George W. Bush's candidacy.)

But rarely has the level of personal nastiness among Republican contenders -- beyond simple policy disagreements -- risen so early and been conducted so openly by the candidates themselves and their campaigns.

"Clearly, the candidates are beginning to more directly attack each other," said Peverill Squire, a political scientist at the University of Iowa. "Certainly between Giuliani and Romney it's getting personal."

Their campaigns insist that they'd like to keep it positive and that it's the other guy who's to blame.

One reason for the nastiness, whoever is at fault, is the lack of an established -- and establishment-favored -- front-runner in the eight-man Republican field. Modern-era Republican primary campaigns have tended to have one heir apparent -- Eisenhower, Nixon, Ford, Reagan, the first Bush, Dole -- which kept negative jibes to a minimum.

There are risks to going negative, especially in the crucial early-voting states of Iowa and New Hampshire, where such campaigns traditionally are anathema.

In New Hampshire, McCain is rising again and competing for second place in most polls as Giuliani and Romney bloody each other. In Iowa, nice-guy Mike Huckabee, a former Arkansas governor, has risen in recent polls to compete for the lead.

"You've got Romney and Giuliani kicking each other in the gut," Lapp said. "And there's Mike Huckabee with bunnies and rainbows, heading toward the finish line."

Dante Scala, a political scientist at the University of New Hampshire, agreed: "John McCain could benefit from a food fight between Mitt and Rudy. He's a well-known commodity in New Hampshire, and voters may get sick of that and take another look at John McCain."

Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.