News & Observer | newsobserver.com |

Nifong to spend a day in jail for contempt

Hearing focused on what Nifong said about DNA test

- Staff Writers

Published: Fri, Aug. 31, 2007 08:00AM

Modified Fri, Aug. 31, 2007 07:10PM

Bookmark and Share email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

DURHAM -- Former District Attorney Mike Nifong will spend a night in jail after being found guilty of criminal contempt by Superior Court Judge W. Osmond Smith III.

Smith ordered Nifong to report to the Durham County jail at 9 a.m. next Friday. He will stay there until 9 a.m. the following day.

The judge could have sentenced Nifong with a $500 fine or up to 30 days in jail.


Under questioning from his attorney Ann Petersen, Mike Nifong describes his policy for sharing information during the discovery process.


Nifong admits that he spent too much time talking to the media during the initial das of the Duke lacrosse case.


Under cross-examination, Nifong admits that his statement to the court that all the evidence was included in the DNA report was not entirely true.

THE NUB OF THE CASE

The contempt charges are limited to a short exchange during the September hearing, when Judge Smith asked Nifong whether the May 2006 DNA report given to defense lawyers was complete:

Smith: "So his [Meehan's] report encompasses it all?"

Nifong (haltingly): "His report encompasses ever -- because we didn't -- they apparently think that everybody I speak to about, I talk about the facts of the case. And that's just, that would be counterproductive. It did not happen here."

Smith: "So you represent there are no other statements from Dr. Meehan?"

Nifong: "No other statements. No other statements made to me."

After a two-day hearing, Smith found that Nifong lied in court when the former prosecutor assured the judge in September 2006 that he had provided the lawyers of three Duke lacrosse players charged with rape with everything he had learned from DNA tests performed by an independent lab.

Nifong testified today that the lab director, Brian Meehan, had briefed him in April 2006 about DNA of several unidentified men found in samples taken from the accuser. Nifong did not disclose that information at the September hearing.

Smith called Nifong's September statements regarding the tests "willfully contemptuous" when he entered his guilty verdict just before 5:30 p.m. today. Nifong was sentenced at about 6:15 p.m.

Earlier today, Nifong took the stand in his own defense, saying that even if he lied about DNA evidence analyzed in the notorious rape case, he did not know he was lying.

"All the statements that I made to the court, at the time I made the statements, I believed them to be true," Nifong said.

But Smith rejected the defense, saying that Nifong was aware of the presence of DNA from the other men when he assured the court the tests yielded no further information. "He was aware he had not provided such information to the then-defendants," Smith said before he made his ruling.

Nifong said today he knew by the end of March 2006 that the State Bureau of Investigation had found no evidence of sperm or semen on the accuser. That was before DNA Security did a more sophisticated test and came up with the presence of DNA.

"This had been a non-ejaculatory event," Nifong said. "There was no semen left during the course of the assault....in which case it would become an eyewitness case."

The eyewitness was the accuser, Crystal Gail Mangum.

The DNA findings were important to the defense at the time, in part because Mangum had told nurses, doctors and police investigators that at least one and perhaps all three of her alleged assailants had ejaculated.

Nifong also said today that he approved a crucial report that failed to note the discovery of DNA from multiple unidentified men in and on Mangum.

Nifong said the results weren't reported because the tests did not match any of the 46 players on the lacrosse team.

"That would not be a problem," Nifong said.

Nifong also offered a unique theory about whose DNA it could have been.

"It could have come from anybody," Nifong said. "She had a son, a very young son."

An unusual moment came before Nifong's testimony, when a judge testified that she expected lawyers to be more honest during trial than during pretrial hearings.

A prosecutor asked the judge, Marcia Morey, whether a lawyer would be following his duty to be candid if he assured a judge that a report was complete when the lawyer knew it to be incomplete.

It depended on whether the case had reached trial, Morey said.

"I do think it makes a difference," Morey said. "Are you are at a trial stage, are you at a pretrial conference."

The three lacrosse players -- Dave Evans, Collin Finnerty and Reade Seligmann -- were declared innocent of all charges in April.

Nifong subsequently lost his law license for misconduct in his handling of the case and resigned as district attorney.

Nifong said this morning that as district attorney, his policy was always to turn over complete evidence to defendants. Normally, he said, he did so even before defense lawyers asked for the information, he said.

Staff writer Joseph Neff can be reached at (919) 829-4516 or joseph.neff@newsobserver.com

Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.