News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Wake Schools

Published: Apr 14, 2006 12:00 AM
Modified: Apr 14, 2006 10:53 AM

Every school year-round?

Wake proposes sweeping change to pare amount of bond issue

Story Tools

THE TAX NUMBERS

$906 - Current tax bill on $150,000 home in Wake County

$936 to $956 - Future tax bill under new school spending plan

$956 to $986 - What it would take to avoid converting any schools to year-round calendar

(STAFF REPORTS)

MULTI-TRACK AND SINGLE-TRACK CALENDARS

School administrators haven't yet come up with an official single-track year-round calendar that they want to use in high schools, most middle schools and magnet elementary schools. But here is the administration's latest draft version.

You can use it to see how the single-track calendar might be organized. You can also see what common days off might exist with the different groups in the multi-track calendar.

The single-track calendar is the same as the six-week calendar in the draft.

Draft calendar for 2007-08 (PDF)

Advertisements


< Previous page

By Thursday, a Web petition from Lee circulating for three days had been signed by about 450 parents objecting to the plan.

The reaction from other parents was mixed.

"I think they'll have a lot of push-back," said Sharon Greeson, who has children at Apex Elementary and Apex High schools. "There will be a lot of issues for people around scheduling. Vacations will become a nightmare."

Still, Greeson said she sees benefits from a year-round calendar and tried previously to get her oldest child into a school following that schedule. She liked the idea of a shorter summer, more consistent education throughout the year and off-season vacations.

Her children would be on the same calendar -- one in middle and one in high school.

"As long as middle and high schools are on the same schedule, it wouldn't affect me," Greeson said. "I realize the school board has to do something, and financially, this makes the most sense."

The district could avoid converting schools, Dulaney said, by putting $150 million more into the plan to build as many as seven more multitrack, year-round schools. He added that, for at least a few years, year-round conversion would reduce the need to reassign students between existing elementary schools.

That's why Linda Davison, who has a first- and third-grader at Brassfield Elementary in North Raleigh, said she supports the shift. "I'm all for year-round if it means my child can stay at Brassfield," Davison said.

Even having her children on two different schedules once her oldest reaches middle school, she said, would be worth the inconvenience in exchange for stability.

The school district has been under pressure to cut costs since a poll released last month by the Greater Raleigh Chamber of Commerce showed weak voter support for a bond issue. None of three proposed options, which would spend between $1.3 billion and $1.9 billion, got majority support in the poll.

Commissioners Joe Bryan and Herb Council, the swing votes on the board, said they're pleased that administrators cut the plan to less than $1 billion. They said they'd be willing to support putting that amount on the ballot.

To keep costs down, school leaders deferred major renovations at nine schools and the construction of six schools that would have significantly reduced the need for mobile classrooms,

"The proposal manages growth, but it doesn't make things better," Dulaney said.

(Staff writer Ryan Teague Beckwith contributed to this report.)


< Previous page

Staff writer T. Keung Hui can be reached at 829-4534 or khui@newsobserver.com.

Get $150+ in coupons in every Sunday N&O. Click here for convenient home delivery.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Print Ads View all ads from past 7 days »

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company