News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Time short for farmland preservation

Published: Jul 24, 2007 12:00 AM
Modified: Jul 24, 2007 02:19 PM

Time short for farmland preservation

Development puts a premium on land in Wake, other urban counties

Story Tools

Audio: Larry D. Perry

Hear Larry D. Perry of Zebulon talk about the easement on 50 acres of his 115-acre property that will protect that section from development.

BY THE NUMBERS

300,000: Acres of farmland the state lost between 2003 and 2006, equivalent to losing about an entire county.

1,000: Number of farms North Carolina lost in 2006.

1: North Carolina's ranking in the country in 2006 of the number of farms lost.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Advertisements
Larry Perry and his brother never want to see subdivisions on farmland that has been in their family since before the Civil War.

Last year, they gave up the right to put houses on 50 acres of their farm in exchange for $475,000 from Wake County and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Perry tries to persuade other farmers to do something similar. He gives talks in Wake and Johnston counties and welcomes visitors to his farm near Zebulon.

"People say I wish we would have done this or that," Perry said. "But it's too late after it's got asphalt on it."

As farming has ebbed following the 2004 tobacco buyout, conservationists hope to catch the wave of aging or retiring farmers looking for other uses for their land. It's a race against developers who are swooping into previously rural areas, such as eastern Wake County.

It is a critical time for money as well, says Maximilian Merrill of the N.C. Agricultural Development and Farmland Preservation Trust Fund. A bond referendum that could inject $1 billion into preserving undeveloped land in North Carolina over the next five years is in limbo in the state legislature.

And the trust fund, which has received only $2.65 million since it was established in 1986, is ready to increase its distribution of grants. In 2005, the legislature gave the trust fund a 19-member advisory board, led by Agriculture Commissioner Steve Troxler, and for the first time a small full-time staff. The House version of the budget this year contains $8 million for the trust fund, but the Senate's version has no funding.

"We're ready to go," Merrill said, "as long as we get the money."

Vying with deep-pocketed developers is not easy.

"Most farmers I talk to, their mailboxes are full of offers," said Kurt Smith, a Wake County open space program manager.

Wake County has its own open space program, which it has funded by about $41 million in bonds issued in 2000 and 2004. Since 2001, the bond money, often matched by town and federal grants, has helped the county buy about 3,500 acres. But almost all the bond money is gone. Wake County voters will decide a $50 million open space bond issue in a referendum in October.

The need to preserve open space is particularly acute in fast-urbanizing places such as Wake County. An estimated 10,000 acres of farmland and forests are gobbled up each year in Wake County by development, according to Emmett Curl, county revenue department director.

Land conservation -- whether through donations, easements or land sales -- can be challenging, Smith said. It is a complex process, involving lots of paperwork and multiple parties. With limited funds, the groups often target properties meeting certain criteria, such as proximity to environmentally sensitive streams.

Deals may be worked out by a land trust, such as Trust for Public Land or Triangle Land Conservancy, then transferred to local governments, such as Wake County. Matching federal grants may require lawyers in Washington to approve the project.

"It ends up being a small percentage of people who have the stomach for it," Smith said.

Larry Perry, 61, sees clear rewards. A retired employee of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, he has always been interested in protecting land. Growing up on the farm and swimming in the critter-filled waters of the Little River inspired him to study wildlife biology at N.C. State University.

Development has been closing in since the opening of U.S. 64 Bypass. The land the Perrys put aside will help protect water quality for a future Little River reservoir Raleigh plans to build.


Next page >

Staff writer Peggy Lim can be reached at 836-5799 or peggy.lim@newsobserver.com.
No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.


The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Print Ads View all ads from past 7 days »

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company