News & Observer | newsobserver.com | State can't prove birth defect link

Published: May 24, 2006 12:30 AM
Modified: May 24, 2006 05:07 AM

State can't prove birth defect link

A report calls for a great increase in oversight in the use of the chemicals

Story Tools

Three cases of birth defects

FRANCISCA HERRERA

Child's birth defect: No arms or legs

Pesticide exposure: Was exposed during the period when the baby's limbs formed to chemicals that cause limb defects in lab animals

Other risk factors: None known

Prenatal care: Began in fourth month of pregnancy; denies use of alcohol, tobacco, drugs or medications

Her statement: Herrera told state investigators that she was sprayed with pesticides while working in the fields, that she was never warned about entering fields where pesticides had been sprayed, and that she was not given equipment to protect her from pesticides.

Report's determination: "Data indicates a plausible association between possible pesticide exposure and the limb deficiencies."

SOSTENES SALAZAR

Child's birth defect: Deformed jaw

Pesticide exposure: Worked with 13 pesticides while her baby's jaw was forming

Other risk factors: Father has small jaw; one previous stillbirth

Prenatal care: Began in fifth month of pregnancy; denies use of alcohol, tobacco, drugs or medications

Her statement: Salazar did not claim she was sprayed with pesticides but said she was never given protective equipment and was rarely told when it was safe to re-enter fields after pesticide applications.

Report's determination: "An association between possible pesticide exposures in North Carolina and the jaw and palate abnormalities ... cannot be ruled out; however, there is evidence to suggest familial inheritance."

MARIA DE LA MESA CRUZ

Child's birth defect: Missing nose, no visible sex organs, died after birth

Pesticide exposure: None in North Carolina during the critical early stages of pregnancy; some documented in an earlier Florida study

Other risk factors: None known

Prenatal care: Unknown

Her statement: None taken

Report's determination: "She did apparently work five days in fields in Florida in ... situations when exposure to pesticide residues above levels considered health protective is likely." The birth defects included "some that have been reported in lab animals after pesticide exposure."

Advertisements
A link is possible between pesticides and the births of three severely deformed children to farmworkers who labored in Eastern North Carolina, state officials say, although they don't have the data to prove it definitively.

But a report released Tuesday says the children's problems -- and the lack of information about what caused them -- should be a call to action.

Health officials called for closer communication among the state's Agriculture, Labor and Health departments. They want more outreach to farmworkers and stricter enforcement of state pesticide laws. And they outline a program, to begin in October, that will track pesticide illnesses.

"Right now, there are different agencies doing bits and pieces," said Sheila Higgins, a nurse with the Department of Health and Human Services who helped write the report. "But nobody ever really pulls the data together to try to describe the number of cases [of pesticide poisoning] that are really occurring, and who it's happening to."

The report is the result of a 10-month study of three children born to migrant farm laborers who picked tomatoes for Ag-Mart, a corporate grower. One child has no limbs, another has a deformed jaw, and a third, who died, had no nose or visible sex organs. They were born within seven weeks, from December 2004 to February 2005.

The study began last summer after the Agriculture Department heard about the children. The department's pesticide section charged the company with 369 violations of pesticide law and asked health officials to investigate the cause of the birth defects.

Agriculture Department inspectors say that Ag-Mart failed to keep workers, including the three pregnant women, out of the fields for required intervals after spraying pesticides.

Ag-Mart is contesting those charges. Company officials say that their workers were protected from pesticide exposure and that the state misinterpreted their records.

Not enough data

Ag-Mart, a Florida company, grows more than 1,000 acres of grape tomatoes in Eastern North Carolina and employs hundreds of migrant workers during the growing season. It markets its tiny tomatoes under the brand name Santa Sweets and also sells them under store labels.

In Tuesday's report, state health officials said that without knowing how much of the chemicals the women absorbed, there is no way to prove that pesticides caused the children's deformities. But the report says that all three women, at critical times in their pregnancies, worked in fields treated with pesticides known to cause birth defects.

Ag-Mart officials said the report established no link between chemicals and the deformities.

"We would all like answers to the questions regarding the birth defects of the three children," Ag-Mart President Don Long said Tuesday in a statement. "We sincerely hope that we'll learn the truth someday soon and that it will offer some level of consolation to the families."

Andrew Yaffa, a Florida lawyer who represents the three women, said the study bolsters his case that pesticides are to blame for the children's defects. He has sued Ag-Mart on behalf of Francisca Herrera, whose son was born without arms or legs. Yaffa says Herrera often was doused with chemicals while pregnant.

"If you read between the lines, this report screams that there's a problem," Yaffa said.

The state's strongest evidence is in Herrera's case.

She spent dozens of hours working in fields freshly treated with the fungicide mancozeb, the report says. That chemical has caused limb defects and missing bones in the offspring of lab rats.


Next page >

Staff writer Kristin Collins can be reached at 829-4881 or kcollins@newsobserver.com.

Print Ads View all ads from past 7 days »

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

Member of the
Real Cities Network

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company