'); } -->
LAKE MEAD, NEV. -- On this brisk, glittering morning, a flat-bottomed boat glides across the massive reservoir that provides Las Vegas its drinking water. An ominous rumble growls beneath the craft as its two long, electrified claws extend into the depths.
Moments later, dozens of stunned fish float to the surface.
Federal scientists scoop them up for transport to a makeshift lab. Within the hour, the researchers will club the 7-pound carp to death, draw their blood, snip out their gonads and pack them in aluminum foil and dry ice.
* In a study still under way, fish collected in waterways near or in Chicago; West Chester, Pa.; Orlando, Fla.; Dallas; and Phoenix have tested positive for an array of pharmaceuticals.
* In a 2003 study in northern Texas, every bluegill, black crappie and channel catfish researchers caught living downstream of a wastewater treatment plant tested positive for the active ingredients in two widely used antidepressants.
* In Colorado's Boulder Creek, 50 of the 60 white suckers collected downstream of Boulder's wastewater treatment plant were female, compared with about half of them upstream.
* In Pakistan, the population of a common vulture virtually disappeared after the birds began eating carcasses of cows that had been treated with an anti-inflammatory drug. Scientists said they eventually determined that the birds' kidneys were failing.
* In a study published last year, researchers dripped the active ingredient in birth control pills into a pristine Canadian lake. After seven weeks, male fathead minnows began producing yolk proteins, their gonads shrank and they stopped reproducing, the scientists said.
The specimens will be flown across the country to laboratories where aquatic toxicologists are studying what happens to fish that live in water contaminated with medications -- from painkillers to prescription antibiotics and mood stabilizers.
A five-month Associated Press investigation has determined that trace amounts of many of the pharmaceuticals we take to stay healthy are seeping into drinking water supplies, and a growing body of research indicates that this could harm humans.
But people aren't the only ones who consume that water. There is more and more evidence that some animals that live in or drink from streams and lakes are seriously affected.
Pharmaceuticals in the water are being blamed for severe reproductive problems in many types of fish: The endangered razorback sucker and male fathead minnow have been found with lower sperm counts and damaged sperm; some walleyes and male carp have become what are called feminized fish, producing egg yolk proteins typically made only by females.
Female fish have developed male genital organs. There are skewed sex ratios in some aquatic populations, and sexually abnormal bass that produce cells for both sperm and eggs.
There are problems with other wildlife as well: kidney failure in vultures, impaired reproduction in mussels, inhibited growth in algae.
"We have no reason to think that this is a unique situation," says Erik Orsak, an environmental contaminants specialist with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, pulling off rubber gloves splattered with fish blood at Lake Mead. "We find pretty much anywhere we look, these compounds are ubiquitous."
Elsewhere in the world -- from the icy streams of England to the wild game reserves of South Africa -- snails, fish, even antelope are showing signs of possible pharmaceutical contamination.
More than 100 different pharmaceuticals have been detected in surface waters throughout the world.
"It's inescapable," said Sudeep Chandra, an assistant professor at the University of Nevada, Reno who studies inland waters and aquatic life. "There's enough global information now to confirm these contaminants are affecting organisms and wildlife."
Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.
The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.
Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.
If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.