News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Misplaced samples delayed water test

Published: Mar 13, 2007 12:30 AM
Modified: Mar 14, 2007 12:20 PM

Misplaced samples delayed water test

Durham officials say samples were moved, then not picked up by private lab

 

Story Tools

Advertisements
******

CORRECTION

A story in the City & State section Tuesday on Durham's failure to test its water for volatile organic compounds incorrectly said state regulators didn't know how many such violations there were in 2006. There were 49, including two issued to Durham for failing to test water from either of its water plants.

******

DURHAM -- City water wasn't tested for volatile organic compounds last year because the samples kept getting misplaced, deputy city manager Ted Voorhees said Monday.

Durham officials issued a news release late Friday afternoon stating that the city had been cited by state regulators for failing to test the water for 21 carbon chemicals that can cause, among other things, headaches, nausea and eye irritation.

Voorhees explained Monday that the samples taken from Durham's two water plants were never picked up by Tritest Inc., the private laboratory the city hired to test for the compounds.

He said the samples were left at the water management department for the lab to retrieve but then were moved to the floor by an employee.

"This whole series of where [the samples] were and who should have picked them up dragged on for a few weeks until the year expired," Voorhees said.

"Frankly, I haven't gotten into the specifics of exactly where they were as much as telling the department that we need to have it very clear exactly where the samples are ... "

Tests on samples from 2006 and 2007 found no volatile compounds, same as the results from the previous five years.

"I hope that puts the issue to bed as far as the actual water quality," Voorhees said.

There is no fine for the violation.

Laura Leonard, spokeswoman for the state's Division of Environmental Health, said officials don't know how many other water systems have failed to test for the compounds.

Durham's water has been under scrutiny from state and federal regulators since spring, when the county Health Department determined that a child younger than 6 had been poisoned by lead from drinking tainted tap water. The identity of the child and the extent of the poisoning have not been disclosed.

In December, The News & Observer reported that the city had withheld key results from its lead testing.

Staff writer Matt Dees can be reached at 956-2433 or matt.dees@newsobserver.com.
No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.


The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Print Ads View all ads from past 7 days »

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company