Michael Peterson wins freedom from electronic monitoring

07/08/2014 3:20 PM

07/08/2014 3:21 PM

Michael Peterson, the Durham novelist suspended between a state of imprisonment and freedom for two and a half years, persuaded a Durham Superior Court judge on Tuesday to give him the liberty to move more freely through the Triangle.

Judge Orlando Hudson agreed to unlatch the electronic monitors locked around his ankles. He must ask permission to leave the state and the family of his wife must be notified first, according to the new conditions of his bond.

Peterson has been subjected to a form of house arrest and electronic monitoring since he won a new murder trial in December 2011 — 937 days.

Peterson stands accused of killing his wife, Kathleen, a Nortel employee found dead at the base of a stairwell in their Durham home.

A Durham jury convicted him of murder in the case on Oct. 10, 2003, after one of the longest trials in North Carolina history.

But in December 2011, Hudson, Durham’s chief resident Superior Court judge, vacated the verdict that put Peterson behind bars for eight years.

The N.C. Court of Appeals issued a ruling in July 2013 upholding Hudson’s decision to grant Peterson a new trial.

And in December 2013, the N.C. Supreme Court declined to take up the case.

Now Durham prosecutors are weighing next steps, which could include another protracted trial, which would be costly for the state and the defendant. They’ve also weighed whether to negotiate a plea deal.

The verdict was vacated after defenses lawyers brought forward evidence about one of the prosecution’s expert witnesses.

That witness, Duane Deaver, a former State Bureau of Investigation blood analyst, was forced out of his job several years ago after an independent review of the state crime lab revealed problems with some of his cases.

Hudson ruled that Deaver conducted unscientific experiments and misled the jury about his experience and credentials.

Kathleen Peterson was found dead on Dec. 9, 2001, and prosecutors went to trial without a murder weapon and one clear motive for her death.

Mike Peterson maintains that he did not murder his wife.

His wife’s family was in court on Tuesday, arguing against the changes to Peterson’s bond conditions.

Editor's Choice Videos

Join the Discussion

News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service