Republicans in the state Senate are set to propose a major overhaul of how classroom teachers are paid in North Carolina, including a pathway to substantial pay raises for teachers who choose to give up tenure. Teachers who want to keep job protections that come with tenure would stay on the current plan – and face stagnant pay.
Draft budget documents obtained by The News & Observer indicate that Senate leaders are planning to spend as much as $468 million more on teacher pay in the next budget year – a significant amount that would provide an average raise of 11 percent for teachers who move to the new pay plan.
With Republicans pledging to avoid tax increases, it is not clear where the money to fund that scale of raises would come from, or what areas of the public education system or elsewhere in state government would face cuts to direct more money to lagging teacher pay.
Senate leader Phil Berger, an Eden Republican, ruled out tax increases a few weeks ago.
Gov. Pat McCrory cut 2 percent from the UNC system to help balance his budget and its more modest plan for teacher raises. McCrory proposed spending about one-fourth the amount on teacher raises compared with the Senate plan.
The legislature in the past has pushed substantial reductions to help pay for its priorities. In 2013, the legislature cut funding for 3,850 teaching assistant positions.
Berger has scheduled a news conference for Wednesday to “make a major education announcement.” His office declined to comment on late Tuesday. Senate Republicans met behind closed doors for several hours on Tuesday to discuss their version of the budget.
Senate leaders are expected to present their complete budget plan later this week, with the teacher plan within it.
The latest documents suggest a change of strategy by Republicans on teacher pay and tenure, issues that have generated protests and sustained criticism. Teachers in North Carolina have not seen substantial increases over the past eight years, under both Democratic and Republican leadership in state government. The Republican plan to end tenure faces court challenges.
The Senate’s plan would:
Plateaus of pay
Republicans have been focused on eliminating a long-standing system of pay for teachers that is based on a teacher’s years in the job; the highest-paid teachers are the longest-serving ones.
The new plan creates plateaus of pay that are higher than the current schedule. For example, a starting teacher would be paid $33,000 per year for the first four years, under the draft plan. Currently, the pay schedule pays a starting salary of $30,800 for a teacher’s first six years.
The current plan and the proposed plan take different paths after the beginning years, too. The new plan would add $1,000 a year until the 21st year, where it levels out at $50,000 through year 30. After 30 years, a teacher gets a 1 percent bonus. The current plan pays a teacher at 20 years a salary of $41,710, but it keeps rising each year.
Still, the effort by Republicans to tie pay to performance would remain.
Local school boards would be required to offer four-year performance-based contracts to the top 25 percent of nontenured teachers for the 2014-15 school year. Those teachers would receive an additional $500 in base pay the first year, rising to $2,000 by the fourth year.
Starting in the 2015-16 school year, school systems could offer a similar bonus that would cover, in all, up to 35 percent of its teachers.
Jacob Vigdor, an education expert from the Sanford School of Public Policy at Duke University, said it’s not likely the state will see big changes in teaching rosters if the Senate plan is adopted.
Vigdor spoke to a legislative committee this year on teacher pay and effectiveness.
Teachers secure in their jobs would be willing to exchange tenure for raises, he said, while teachers who are nervous about their jobs because they don’t get along with their supervisors or feel underappreciated will keep their tenure and raises.
Moreover, Vigdor said, principals don’t think that dismissing teachers will improve their schools. Most principals would rather work with the teachers they have, he said, including those teachers who need to do better.
“The first instinct is to help personnel through those troubles and to help them improve,” he said.
Changing tenure unique
Two national experts said a statewide plan asking teachers to trade tenure for a higher pay scale would be unique.
The District of Columbia school system asked teachers to give up tenure in order to opt into a higher scale, but no states have done so, said Sandi Jacobs of the National Council on Teacher Quality, a nonpartisan education reform group based in Washington, D.C.
She said North Carolina is among only 15 states that still have a state salary scale, “and they generally have not been the ones changing tenure policies.”
A spokeswoman for the National Education Association said that other states have eliminated tenure for new hires, but the group’s legal counsel is not aware of any that have asked teachers who already have tenure to give it up for higher pay.
Under the plan, teachers with many years of experience would not see substantial pay increases if they switched to the new plan. That suggests some may opt to stay under the current system.
The bulk of the new money is directed largely at classroom teachers, which is reflective of research cited repeatedly by Republicans in focusing on improving student learning. They cite studies that say teacher quality is essential to student performance but that other personnel do not have the same impact.