Brad Cooper has pleaded guilty to second-degree murder in the 2008 death of his wife, Nancy Cooper.
Read the latest story here. The previous story is below.
The former Cisco employee reportedly has been considering a possible plea to second-degree murder in the 2008 death of Nancy Cooper.
Though plea offers have been talked about since 2008, when Brad Cooper was arrested and charged with killing his wife, the 40-year-old from Canada has maintained that he was not guilty of first-degree murder.
Never miss a local story.
But Cooper is scheduled to be back in Wake County Superior Court on Monday morning. His former in-laws have alerted media outlets that they plan to come to Raleigh from Canada with hopes of closure in a case that keeps the two Cooper girls, now 8 and 10, in a state of limbo.
Cooper was convicted of first-degree murder in spring 2011.
The verdict came after nearly 36 days of testimony with almost 100 witnesses.
The trial exposed a social scene among the big houses of Cary, where neighbors fell into duplicitous relationships or extramarital trysts after getting together for board-game nights, backyard barbecues or Halloween parties.
The N.C. Court of Appeals Court overturned the verdict in April 2013 and the N.C. Supreme Court refused to review the case despite a request from the state attorney general.
The evidence in the Cooper case was largely circumstantial. Jurors said afterward that prosecutors won with computer evidence that defense lawyers tried to quash.
The defense argued that the police investigation of Nancy Cooper’s death in July 2008 was inept. They had hoped to argue before the jury that the crucial computer evidence could have been tampered with and perhaps planted by investigators – arguments that they planned to introduce through their own expert witnesses.
Wake County Superior Court Judge Paul Gessner allowed prosecutors to introduce evidence of a Google Maps search of the site where Nancy Cooper’s body had been found. Prosecutors argued that the map search and time stamps associated with it showed that Brad Cooper had searched for a site to dump his wife’s body.
The defense team, however, raised questions about the validity of the time stamps on the laptop files.
Gessner ruled against the defense’s attempt to classify two witnesses as forensics experts to raise questions about the computer evidence.
The appeals court judges noted that the “sole physical evidence linking” Brad Cooper to the homicide was the Google Maps search. “Absent this evidence, the evidence connecting Defendant to this crime was primarily potential motive, opportunity, and testimony of suspicious behavior,” the ruling states.
Further, the appeals court panel added that “whether the error was constitutional or not,” failure to let Brad Cooper use his experts was a key error that warranted a new trial.
Though Cooper did not testify at his trial, he told Cary investigators that his wife went jogging and never returned home.
At the trial, prosecutors called numerous friends and family members of Nancy Cooper to testify to the couple’s crumbling relationship.
Nancy Cooper, the more outspoken of the two, had told many people that she wanted out of her marriage and planned to return to her native Canada with their two children.
Friends described Nancy Cooper as an emotionally battered wife, a former career woman in Canada who had to rely on her husband for her financial well-being because she did not have the necessary documents to work in this country. Friends testified that her husband gave her an allowance but cut off her access to the couple’s bank accounts.
Defense attorneys contended that Nancy Cooper spent beyond the family’s means and that her husband instituted financial controls to protect their assets.