News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Cure just requires the political will

Published: Apr 20, 2008 12:30 AM
Modified: Apr 20, 2008 01:43 AM

Cure just requires the political will

 

Story Tools

Advertisements
Come election year, every candidate has got a plan to remake health care.

Republicans favor changes that rely on market forces. Democrats see government continuing to play a major role, with gains in health insurance coverage coming from the expansion of existing programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. It can seem like they're not talking about the same problem.

We asked Adam Searing, a health policy expert with the N.C. Justice Center, for help navigating the candidates' health-care plans. His group seeks affordable health care for all residents of the state.

Q: Do elected leaders have much ability to affect the cost and availability of health care?

A: Yes, they have huge influence. Elected leaders could ensure coverage for almost everyone, and they could do it almost immediately. All it requires is political will, and that hasn't been there.

Q: What sort of changes can be made at the state level, and what has to come from the federal level?

A: States can do a lot, actually. We can use state dollars to subsidize premiums for small businesses. We can expand existing programs (such as Medicaid or N.C. Health Choice for Children) to cover more people. We could limit health insurers' ability to charge more if a person is sick. The state could make great strides, but we'd need the federal government's help to finish the race.

Q: What strategies do you hear the Democrats and Republicans talking about?

A: At the state level, Democrats are talking about helping specific groups, such as small businesses and parents of children who qualify for public health insurance. At the federal level, Democrats talk about achieving close to universal health insurance coverage using a mix of public and private programs. Republicans at the state and federal level talk a lot about putting more responsibility on the consumer. You hear a lot more about high-deductible health plans, tax credits and tort reform. There's a lot more interest in giving individuals some money (instead of offering coverage through a job) and letting them buy their own plan.

Q: What advice can you give voters in assessing candidates' proposals?

A: Voters should look very carefully at what is being proposed. Every candidate says they're for affordable coverage for everybody. But the devil is really in the details. How would the plan work if you are sick? Would an older parent (not yet eligible for Medicare) be able to get affordable coverage? One question I like to ask is: "Would the candidate drop whatever health coverage they have now and enroll in the plan they are proposing?"

All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published, broadcast or redistributed in any manner.

Get $150+ in coupons in every Sunday N&O. Click here for convenient home delivery.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company