News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Utilities must change their business model

Published: May 25, 2008 12:30 AM
Modified: May 25, 2008 02:02 AM

Utilities must change their business model

 

Story Tools

Advertisements
(Bill Holman, a former secretary of the state Department of Environment and Natural Resources, is director of state policy at the Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions at Duke University.)

I believe that this drought, combined with awareness of a rapidly growing population and a warming climate, has convinced many people that the era of cheap and abundant water is over.

However, most of our public and private water utilities are still using a 20th-century business model that depends on selling gallons of water to pay capital, operating and maintenance costs. That model worked well in the 20th century, when water was abundant. It failed in the drought, when water was scarce.

Our utilities need to change their business model to sell water services instead of gallons. Customers want water services -- hot showers, clean clothes, clean dishes, sanitation and healthy landscapes -- not gallons.

If our utilities help us become more efficient, we may pay more per gallon, but we will use less and keep our bills reasonable. Increasing efficient use of water also increases efficient use of energy. Pumping, treating, heating and cooling water requires vast amounts of energy.

Cooling coal- and nuclear-fired power plants requires vast amounts of water. Increasing energy efficiency reduces demands for cooling water. Installing, operating and maintaining more efficient fixtures, appliances, toilets and landscapes requires skilled labor and creates opportunities for new companies and trades.

During the drought, we stopped irrigating our gardens and landscapes with drinking water. We flushed our toilets with drinking water less frequently. We began to ask, why are we using highly treated, valuable drinking water to flush our toilets, water our lawns, cool our buildings and wash our cars?

Shouldn't we capture and reuse the water running off our rooftops and driveways for irrigation and cooling -- like the General Assembly has done?

In the 20th century, stormwater was an expensive water quality problem. In the 21st century, stormwater should become another source of water.

Shouldn't we also reuse treated wastewater for industrial processing, cooling and irrigating golf courses -- instead of drinking water? And reduce wastewater discharges into the Neuse and other rivers? Treated wastewater should also become a resource in the 21st century.

Global competition for water, energy and materials is increasing. We must apply new technologies, markets and policies to transform the way we use these resources to sustain our economy and environment.

All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published, broadcast or redistributed in any manner.
No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.


The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Print Ads View all ads from past 7 days »

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company