'); } -->
The N.C. Highway Patrol took its police dogs out of service indefinitely Wednesday, after a hearing exposed rough obedience techniques such as shocking, suspending and kicking dogs.
Bryan Beatty, secretary of the state Department of Crime Control and Public Safety, ordered the suspension of the canine program until a review is completed showing what training techniques were used and how they compare to generally accepted practices. The patrol has 10 dogs that mostly sniff out drugs.
"We believe that we need to look at the operations, determine whether or not they are following proper procedure and whether or not we need to make any major changes to the program," said Beatty, who oversees the patrol.
The review comes after several troopers testified during a three-day hearing into the firing of patrol Sgt. Charles L. Jones for mistreating dogs.
Jones was fired in September, a month after a trooper used a cell phone to record footage of Jones suspending his dog, Ricoh, from a railing, then kicking him at least five times. Jones, who is seeking to be reinstated, testified that what he did was not abusive and that trainers had used several other rough methods.
Ricoh, a 7-year-old Belgian Malinois, was not seriously hurt. He has since been retired from the patrol.
While none of the troopers in the Jones hearing testified that they had similarly punished a dog, they recounted many other harsh measures. They said dogs had been shocked with stun guns, kicked, suspended from their leashes until they were nearly unconscious and hit with plastic bottles filled with stones. Troopers talked about twirling dogs on their leashes in a method known as helicoptering; in some cases the dogs were released while they spun in the air.
The troopers said the procedures are necessary to control powerful, aggressive dogs that can inflict serious injury. Some police dog training experts dispute the tactics, saying they are relics from a time when dogs were used more for crowd control than drug interdiction.
Beatty said he was surprised to learn such tactics were being used. A previous review reported that such tactics exist but not within the patrol, he said. The patrol banned the use of shock collars three years ago.
"We've had no complaints about the unit," Beatty said. "It has performed well and served a very valuable function in terms of narcotics detection. It's taken a lot of drugs off the highways. And, until the videotape of Jones, there was no indication that there was any problem."
Beatty said that the patrol will request dogs from other police departments if needed. He did not rule out ending the canine program, which has been in use for about 20 years.
The dog-kicking video became public Monday when it was shown during the hearing. Since then, it has been played nationally. It can be found on YouTube, and popular rapper 50 Cent linked to it from his Web site this week.
Gov. Mike Easley's office said it has received scores of calls and e-mail messages supporting Jones' firing. A forum on The News & Observer's Web site had about 200 postings that overwhelmingly supported Jones' ouster.
In his own words
On Wednesday, Jones, 39, testified in his defense. A 12-year member of the patrol, Jones said that he did not abuse Ricoh and that he would not have been fired if his actions had not been recorded on video.
He teared up twice during his testimony. The first time was when he was asked how he felt about Ricoh.
"I spent more time with Ricoh than I did my wife," he said.
The second time was when he described the process that led to his dismissal. Evidence showed that he was originally headed for no more than a three-day suspension, but when the media learned of the video's existence a second investigation kicked into high gear. Easley and his staff looked at the video and told Beatty and a patrol spokesman that Jones should be fired. He was, less than 10 days later.
Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.
The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.
Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.
If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.