News & Observer | newsobserver.com |

Skeptics sound off over sludge

Biosolids are used as fertilizer

- Staff Writer

Published: Wed, May. 14, 2008 12:30AM

Modified Wed, May. 14, 2008 02:44AM

Bookmark and Share
email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

GRAHAM -- Some farmers say it has kept them in business. Others say that there's no way to know what's in it and that it should not go on fields.

The state Division of Water Quality heard from people Tuesday on both sides of the controversy over sewage sludge, or "biosolids," applied to farm fields. The division held a public hearing on a permit renewal the city of Burlington applied for in 2003 to continue putting solids from its wastewater plants on farm fields.

Environmentalists say the sludge contains pathogens, heavy metals and industrial pollutants, and that people living near fields where it is sprayed have had health problems. They also say Burlington has been operating on an expired permit for four years.

According to documents available online, Tuesday's hearing was the first on the renewal of the permit to apply sewage sludge to farmlands in six counties, including Orange and Chatham. About 70 people attended the meeting at Alamance Community College.

The sewage sludge comes from Burlington's wastewater treatment plants, left over after wastewater is treated and discharged. Farmers can apply to have it sprayed for free on their fields as fertilizer by a company called Synagro.

According to water quality documents, Mebane resident Nancy Holt asked for a public hearing on the permit application in January 2004, saying neighborhood children had developed sores after playing in a creek.

Chatham County also requested a public hearing earlier this year. In its comments, the county said 5.4 million gallons of sludge were applied on Chatham farm fields in 2006.

The county said that larger setbacks are needed between sludge applications and schools, wells and homes, and that more testing is needed.

The Chatham County Board of Commissioners also requested an explanation of why Burlington has been operating on an expired permit and asked the state for a guarantee of better permit oversight.

Although its permit expired, Burlington has been able to continue applying the biosolids to fields under the state's Administrative Procedures Act.

The long delay in deciding on a renewal doesn't mean the state is leaning against it, a water quality supervisor said last year. Applications are supposed to be denied within 90 days of being submitted if the state intends to deny them, she said.

Orange County says there are more than 3,000 acres of approved biosolid sites in the county, used by municipalities including Burlington, Hillsborough, Durham and the Orange Water and Sewer Authority.

The Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League held a brief news conference before Tuesday's public hearing. Several farmers and landowners spoke against the practice.

"The stuff stinks to the high heavens," said Saxapahaw farmer Kevin Meehan. "Farming should have a wholesome smell to it."

Farmer Charles Sydnor of Snow Camp said he stopped using sludge on his fields in part because he didn't know exactly what it contained.

"It probably has a great many things that neither them nor I know about," he said.

Sydnor said the spraying was attractive to farmers because fertilizer prices have tripled in the past four to five years.

More than 20 people spoke during the public hearing, including representatives from Chatham and Orange counties, public works staff from the city of Burlington, farmers, environmentalists and residents who live near fields.

samuel.spies@newsobserver.com or (919) 932-2014

Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.