News & Observer | newsobserver.com |

Teen cell phone ban appears to have fallen on deaf ears

- Staff Writer

Published: Mon, Jun. 09, 2008 12:30AM

Modified Mon, Jun. 09, 2008 04:35AM

Bookmark and Share
email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

A new traffic safety study suggests that North Carolina teenagers have not paid much attention to a state law that bans cell phone use by drivers under 18.

The ban is part of the state's graduated licensing program, designed to limit distractions and risky behavior that can get rookie drivers into trouble.

In spring 2007, five months after the law took effect, researchers saw teen drivers talking on their phones at about the same frequency as in fall 2006.

WHAT THE LAW SAYS

Drivers under 18 years old are barred by North Carolina law from using mobile telephones while driving. The ban took effect in December 2006. It also covers other wireless activity including text messaging, e-mail, music and games.

Exceptions to the ban allow teen drivers to use their phones to talk with:

* Parents, spouses and legal guardians.

* Police, medical and other emergency personnel, regarding emergency situations.

The violation is an infraction and carries a $25 fine. Driver's insurance points are not affected. But a violation can delay a driver's ability to move from provisional to full driving privileges under North Carolina's graduated license program.

A similar law, which became effective in December 2007, bars school bus drivers from talking by cell phone while their buses are rolling.

"It looks like there wasn't really any change in cell phone use after this restriction took effect," said Robert D. Foss, a senior research scientist with the Highway Safety Research Center at UNC-Chapel Hill.

"Using a cell phone while driving is risky for anybody," Foss said. "And young teens have a very high crash risk, because they're still learning to drive in the first couple of years."

The study was conducted by the UNC center and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, based in Arlington, Va. Researchers parked outside 25 high schools and watched as teens drove away in the afternoon to see how many were talking on their phones.

In October 2006, 11 percent of the teens were talking on their phones as they drove away from school. In April 2007, the rate was 11.8 percent, a difference that was not statistically significant, Foss said.

The researchers also quizzed teens and parents about the law in before-and-after telephone interviews.

Teens interviewed a few months after the law took effect were more likely than their parents to know about it: 64 percent of teens were aware of the ban, compared to 39 percent of parents. Asked whether they approved of the ban, young drivers were less likely (74 percent) than their parents (95 percent) to say it was a good idea.

Foss acknowledged that researchers could not be sure of the statistics they logged while watching young drivers leave high school parking lots.

They didn't know how many of the drivers were under 18, and they didn't know how many of them were making after-school phone calls to their parents -- an exception allowed under the state law.

The results are not surprising, he said. The 2006 law has not been widely publicized. Police enforcement numbers are low because officers, like the UNC researchers, can't be sure whether a cell-phone-using driver is 18 or younger.

"This needs to be publicized more widely," Foss said. "Parents need to make clear to their teens that they don't want them to talk on the phone when they're driving."

bruce.siceloff@newsobserver.com or blogs.newsobserver.com/crosstown or (919) 829-4527

Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.