'); } -->
******
CORRECTION
A story in the Triangle & State section Sunday incorrectly said that U.S. Army deserter Jeremy Hinzman was allowed to stay in the United States while the military considered his application for conscientious objector status. Hinzman was deployed with his unit to Afghanistan.
******
A deserter from Fort Bragg who was ordered deported from Canada last week would probably have gotten a lighter punishment if he had simply stayed in the United States and quietly turned himself in, Army statistics suggest.
Former 82nd Airborne Division paratrooper Jeremy Hinzman, 29, and his supporters in the United States and Canada think he'll be court-martialed for desertion if he is forced to return, in part because he fled to Canada and in part because he has been outspoken about his case and his opposition to the war in Iraq. The Canada Border Services Agency ruled Wednesday that Hinzman, his wife and two young children would have to leave by Sept. 23.
A simple definition of "deserter" is a service member who has been absent without leave for more than 30 days. The military doesn't usually hunt them, but civilian authorities pick up some during routine traffic stops or arrests for civilian crimes, and hand them over to the military.
Deserters who remain in the United States and turn themselves in quietly are seldom prosecuted for the offense. Instead, many are given administrative penalties, including one of various types of discharge that make it more difficult to get a civilian job. Others return to duty with punishments such as loss of rank.
The number of deserters dipped as the Iraq war began and then rose again, from about 2,650 in the fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 2005, to a little less than 4,700 last fiscal year. But in 2007, just 108 were convicted of desertion. That is a typical figure since the war began.
The act of turning yourself in can prevent prosecution for desertion because it's obvious proof you have returned, said Chuck Fager, director of Quaker House, a Fayetteville group that for decades has counselled troops who want to leave the military or who have left it.
"When someone comes back voluntarily, even years later, they almost always aren't prosecuted for desertion," Fager said.
Fager counselled Hinzman before he deserted and has continued to talk to him regularly about his situation.
"Our preference would have been for him to turn himself in, but we don't advise people what to do," Fager said. "We can tell them what has happened to others in the same situation."
No killing
Hinzman, speaking in a telephone interview from Canada, said he probably would have been prosecuted in any case because he has firm convictions about war and killing, and would have spoken out regardless of which means he'd chosen to leave the Army.
"I'd happily go to jail rather than shoot innocent Iraqis or kill anyone," he said, adding that he believes the Iraq war is wrong.
It was after training that he realized he couldn't kill, Hinzman said. He applied for conscientious objector status before his unit was sent to Afghanistan, and he was allowed to stay in the United States while his request was considered.
He said that he would have had no problem going into combat, as long as he didn't have to kill. In the application, Hinzman said, he offered to serve in a front-line unit as a medic.
When his application was denied and his unit ordered to Iraq in 2003, he decided to desert. He, his wife and their young son arrived in Canada in January 2004, where they officially sought refugee status. They added a baby girl to the family a few weeks ago.
Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.
The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.
Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.
If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.