'); } -->
The state's highest court will hear legal arguments today that could break the two-year stalemate on executions in North Carolina -- or extend the de facto moratorium.
The N.C. Medical Board has effectively shut down the executions, which are done by lethal injection, by prohibiting doctors from taking part. The board contends such participation violates the profession's mission to preserve life.
But state law requires a doctor to be on hand, and botched injections in other states in recent years have emphasized that need.
The state Department of Correction filed suit in March 2007, after doctors said they could not risk their licenses by participating. State Superior Court Judge Donald Stephens sided with correction officials, prompting the medical board to appeal.
Noelle Talley, a spokeswoman for the state Attorney General's Office, which is representing the Department of Correction, said the N.C. Supreme Court could settle the matter. She said there is no federal question for U.S. courts to pursue.
She declined further comment, as did Keith Acree, a correction spokesman, and Jean Fisher Brinkley, a medical board spokeswoman.
There are 163 inmates on death row. The last execution took place Aug. 18, 2006, when Samuel Flippin, 36, was put to death for killing his 2-year-old stepdaughter.
The court is not expected to issue a ruling today.
If the court rules that the medical board cannot bar doctors from taking part in executions, lawyers representing death row inmates have another legal avenue to pursue. They have challenged a Council of State decision setting up the execution procedure because the statewide elected officials did not allow for comment from the lawyers.
An administrative law judge agreed with the attorneys, but the case has been appealed to state Superior Court. Stephens held a hearing last month on the issue but has not decided the case.
Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.
The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.
Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.
If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.