News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Local & State

Published: Nov 26, 2006 12:00 AM
Modified: Nov 27, 2006 11:43 AM

N.C. arms against threat of flu pandemic

Officials are stockpiling money and resources in anticipation of a deadly influenza outbreak that many say will overwhelm the state

Story Tools

AT ITS WORST

A modern rerun of the 1918-1919 pandemic flu could mean:

2 million - Possible deaths in the U.S.

90 million - Number of Americans potentially infected

66,075 - Possible deaths in North Carolina

291,015 - North Carolinians needing hospital care, competing for only ...

20,639 - ... licensed and staffed beds at 124 hospitals in the state

PANDEMIC INFORMATION SOURCES

Statistics used in these stories for death tolls, hospitalizations and the demand for life-saving ventilators in North Carolina are based on two computer models developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. News & Observer database manager David Raynor used the latest population projection for North Carolina -- 8.6 million -- to produce a statistical outline of a pandemic's potential impact.

In addition, Raynor and researchers Paulette Stiles and Lamara Williams-Hackett telephoned 124 hospitals statewide to determine their number of ventilators, a crucial piece of medical equipment to help flu-stricken patients breathe. Of those called, 107 hospitals responded, including all of the state's major trauma centers such as WakeMed Raleigh Campus.

News researchers Becky Ogburn, Susan Ebbs and Denise Jones also contributed to this report.

TRYING TO BREATHE

The gap between available ventilators and those who would need them:

Number of ventilators nationwide

742,000

Americans needing ventilators at the worst point of a pandemic

Ventilators at 107 N.C. hospitals that responded to a recent N&O survey

Flu patients in North Carolina needing a ventilator during the height of a pandemic

CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION; CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE; N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA CENTER FOR DISEASE RESEARCH AND POLICY; N&O RESEARCH

Advertisements


< Previous page
Next page >

There is even a "worst-case scenario" highlighted by federal health officials for state and local planners to ponder and dread: the Spanish flu pandemic of 1918-19, the deadliest outbreak in the 20th century, which killed an estimated 675,000 Americans and up to 100 million people worldwide.

"It's the biological Katrina," said Steve Cline, North Carolina's deputy public health director.

A prime suspect for a pandemic: the H5N1 avian flu virus, an Asian strain that has proven ultralethal to humans, producing some of the same sudden-death symptoms as the Spanish flu virus and the same ability to kill young adults with healthy immune systems.

"It could be the closest thing to 1918 we've ever seen," said Dr. Paul Biddinger, an associate director at the Harvard School of Public Health.

Although a different avian flu strain could mutate into a pandemic killer, scientists focus on the H5N1 strain because it already has proved it can jump from birds to humans and has shown a limited ability to pass between people in close contact, killing 50 percent or more of those it infects.

"Once we get human-to-human transmission, a pandemic will happen like that," said Mary Lou Dobbs, manager of the emergency response team at Rex Hospital, with a snap of her fingers.

How N.C. is preparing

North Carolina public health officials have a renewed sense of urgency about preparing for this potential disaster. The state is on pace to spend more than $12 million in state and federal money to calculate the ability of hospitals to handle a pandemic and to start stockpiling crucial medicine and medical equipment. That includes more than $4 million spent on a 400-bed tent hospital that will be divided into eight 50-bed units stationed across the state.

Health officials have conducted pandemic flu conferences, set up a task force on the ethical questions raised by a global outbreak and run tabletop training exercises with emergency managers to sharpen their planned response.

But they also have reached a grim conclusion: No amount of money, preparation and stockpiling will provide airtight protection against a severe flu pandemic.

"You can't spend that much -- it's not realistic," said U.S. Sen. Richard Burr, the North Carolina Republican who has a leading role in federal planning for pandemic flu, bioterrorism and public health preparedness. "That's why at the end of a tabletop drill, at the end of an exercise, everybody says when you ask 'What do we do?' they say 'We better get a vaccine.' "

That won't happen, though, for four to six months after the pandemic strikes. It takes time for researchers to isolate the virulent strain and concoct a vaccine serum to protect people from it. The massive quantity needed will also be delayed because flu vaccine production relies on an egg-based system developed in the 1950s.

This will force public health officials to rely on measures developed at the turn of the last century to dampen the spread of the disease -- shut down public events, isolate the sick and quarantine people suspected of infection. Expect travel restrictions, particularly on airline flights to Asia, home of the virulent avian flu.

Until there is a vaccine, doctors and nurses will be powerless to prevent infection by a flu virus from which no one is safe.

A pandemic's spread

Pandemics are caused by a virus that the immune system doesn't recognize, a new mutation far different from the strains now in circulation. Although seasonal flu symptoms are unpleasant -- fever, cough, runny nose and muscle pain -- the bug is rarely fatal. Those who die are usually victims of a secondary infection, such as bacterial pneumonia.


< Previous page
Next page >

Staff writer Jim Nesbitt can be reached at (919) 829-8955 or jim.nesbitt@newsobserver.com.
No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.


The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Print Ads View all ads from past 7 days »

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company