News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Battling bad germs

Published: Jul 10, 2007 12:00 AM
Modified: Jul 10, 2007 02:48 AM

Battling bad germs

Scientists at UNC-Chapel Hill have discovered a new weapon against drug-resistant bacteria. It works by shutting down the process bacteria use to share genetic information

Story Tools

TEN COMMON ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANT BACTERIA AND THEIR INFECTIONS

1. Staphylococcus aureus: Bacterial blood infection, pneumonia, surgical-wound infections

2. Streptococcus pneumoniae: Meningitis, pneumonia, ear infection

3. Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Tuberculosis

4. Haemophilus influenzae: Epiglottitis, meningitis, middle ear infection, pneumonia, sinus infection

5. Enterobacteriaceae (e.g. Klebsiella pneumonia, E. coli, Salmonella): Blood infection, pneumonia, urinary-tract or surgical- wound infections, diarrhea

6. Enterococcus: Blood infection, urinary-tract or surgical-wound infections

7. Neisseria gonorrhoeae: Gonorrhea

8. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Blood infection, pneumonia, urinary-tract infections

9. Bacteroides: Septicemia, anaerobic infections

10. Shigella dysenteriae: Severe diarrhea

CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST

Advertisements
Two drugs used to treat bone loss in old age may provide a new weapon against antibiotic-resistant bacteria blamed for nearly 100,000 hospital deaths across the country each year, researchers at UNC-Chapel Hill discovered.

The drugs both snuff out hard-to-kill bacteria and short-circuit their "sex life," opening a possible new avenue of attack against bugs that have become increasingly resistant to common antibiotics, said Matt Redinbo, a UNC-CH professor of chemistry, biochemistry and biophysics.

"Potentially, we have a brand new way to kill the most dangerous bacteria that are out there," said Redinbo, senior author of the study released Monday and slated for online publication in a scientific journal this week. "It's becoming harder and harder to find drugs that effectively kill bacteria in humans."

From pneumonia and tuberculosis to simple staph infections, stubborn bacteria pose a dangerous worldwide medical threat from infectious diseases once thought conquered by miracle drugs such as penicillin or its pharmaceutical offspring. In the United States alone, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates 1.7 million hospital patients get an infection each year, with 99,000 dying. More than 70 percent of the bacteria that cause hospital infections are resistant to at least one of the antibiotics commonly used to treat them.

As a result, patients infected with resistant bacteria have longer hospital stays and require treatment with different medicines that may be more toxic and expensive, driving up health care costs, according to a CDC report. Hospitals have also been forced to develop expensive and cumbersome protocols to combat the spread of hard-to-kill bacteria, isolating infected patients and requiring doctors and nurses to wear masks, gloves and other protective gear.

Triangle hospital officials say they are caught in a squeeze play: More patients with stubborn infections; fewer antibiotics that are fully effective.

"The problem it creates for us in a hospital is that patients are sicker and harder to treat," said Robin Carver, interim director for infection prevention and control at WakeMed's main Raleigh campus. "Our options keep getting smaller and smaller and smaller."

That's why researchers, while cautious not to hype the early results, are hoping for a bigger payoff from the laboratory discovery of one of Redinbo's graduate students, Scott Lujan.

"The potential for its impact is great, but more research needs to be done," said Dr. David Hecht, professor of medicine, microbiology and immunology and infectious disease division chief at Loyola University Health Systems near Chicago.

Surprise in the lab

So far, UNC-CH laboratory research on E. coli bacteria brought a hoped-for result. Two off-the-shelf bone loss drugs, clodronate and etidronate, blocked a key mechanism used to squirt genetic changes from one bad bug into another, including the gene that helps ward off an antibiotic attack.

But the research, which still has to be duplicated in animals and humans, also produced a surprise -- the two drugs killed any bug that already had the antibiotic-resistant gene. The scientists aren't sure why this happened.

"We didn't expect this," said Redinbo, whose study will appear in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. "It kills the bad guys with the gun whether they're shooting it or not."

This discovery is important because a broad range of bacteria use this mechanism to pass along "genetic upgrades." The bugs not only pass this information between the same type of bacteria, but between different kinds of bacteria, exponentially increasing the problem of antibiotic resistance, Hecht said.


Next page >

Staff writer Jim Nesbitt can be reached at 829-8955 or jim.nesbitt@newsobserver.com.
News researcher Denise Jones contributed to this report.
No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.


The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

Member of the
Real Cities Network

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company